This is kind of an interesting story from the standpoint of how the Clintons tend to spin things.
A fellow who had bombs strapped to him with duct tape took Clinton campaign workers from the New Hampshire office hostage. The fellow has several aliases, but the article identifies him as “Leeland Eisenberg”.
He thinks there is a ‘chimp’ chip planted inside his head…some have said he’s a paranoid schizophrenic off his meds. Regardless, he took at least four people hostage, but surrendered to police.
Said Cao @ 6:57 pm Comments (5) | Permalink
Error 500 Internal Server Error
Cao’s blog, my home blog and the place where I do the majority of my writing, is down for an undetermined length of time since my readers and then I, encountered the dreaded 500 Internal Server Error this morning.
There is no easy fix to this, as it appears. The problem has been handed off to the hosting company, and I hope they can figure out what is wrong in order to get CB back online.
Said Cao @ 6:47 am Comments (4) | Permalink
Ya know, just in case the ED pill guys stop by….Al Gore climate change site hacked! Then again, Al isn’t getting any younger…
Said xformed @ 7:42 pm Comments (2) | Permalink

In a cruel twist of ironic fate, the well know (or little known, depends on where you stand on the issue) “Ecowarrior” hit an iceberg and spilled 40,000 gallons on oil in the “priistine” environment the wackos….er, environmentalists, where trying to protect……
for more go to:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_112707/content/01125107.guest.html
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/780
Notice the news is mostly out of Canada…..where are you MSNBC, CNN, and other liberal outlets?
Said Richard Nixon @ 11:41 am Comments (1) | Permalink

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth fighting for is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his won personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
- John Stuart Mill
Said Richard Nixon @ 12:58 pm Comments (0) | Permalink
A money bundler for Hillary Clinton in South Texas named Alonzo Cantu has, according to the Washington Post, raised some $640,000 in Hidalgo County, Texas–an area along the Mexican border in which one would be being very kind in describing as ‘not exactly the Hamptons’. In the same area, over the same timeframe. Barack Obama has raised $2,086.
Lee Cary looks closely at the Cantu story, and recalls that it evokes the ghosts of LBJ’s 1947 stolen election in Duval County, also in South Texas:
Meanwhile, this story reminds those of us who live in Texas of another political campaign here back in 1947. The Senatorial election that year was between a legend in Texas politics and a young congressman from Austin. The legend, Coke Stevenson, had been the Speaker of the Texas House, Lieutenant Governor, and twice elected Governor. The congressman was Lyndon Johnson.
When the Texas Election Bureau closed on Election Day, Stevenson led by 854 votes. But the counting wasn’t done, and neither was the voting. Resolution of the contested results would be a precursor of the 2000 Presidential Election drama in Florida, except more crudely complicated. Johnson eventually won by 87 votes in an election where 988,295 votes were allegedly cast. “Allegedly” is the operative word.
[…]
Johnson’s big vote bundler was George Berham Parr, who solely controlled the Democratic Party machine in Duvall and Jim Hogg Counties, just north of Hidalgo County. Parr also exercised significant influence in other Southeast Texas border counties including Webb, Cameron, Nueces, and Hidalgo. Caro quotes the description of Parr, El Patron, written by a Corpus Christi Caller-Times reporter named James M. Rowe, who knew Rio Grande Valley politics well:
It is not easy for the average person to imagine what it was like…to oppose Boss Parr in his own county. A word from him was sufficient to get a man fired from his job or denied welfare payments or surplus commodities distributed to the needy. Merchants who opposed him faced the sudden loss of most of their trade. Little farmer and ranchers were intimated by the pistoleros. (p.185)
Parr’s most ominous pistolero was his six-gun totting enforcer, Luis Salas. Days after the polls closed, Salas added 200 votes for Johnson to Ballot Box 13 in Jim Webb County. The fact that all the votes were recorded in the same handwriting was a clue. But the box was never examined by those who adjudicated the election results; it had disappeared by then.
Revised returns gave Johnson a 3,000 vote margin of victory in Hidalgo County. In the six Southeast Texas border-area counties most heavily influenced by the Boss Parr machine, Johnson tallied 10,323 votes to Stevenson’s 1,329. In Parr’s home county of Duvall, it was Johnson 2,908 - Stevenson 38. It all makes the chads and dimples show of South Florida look like child’s play.
So what does this have to do with Hillary’s McAllen bundler?
In 60 years, Election Day practices have changed considerably in Texas. Today, it’s not easy anymore to use patronage and intimidation to stuff ballot boxes. But, when that kind of money, $640,000, comes from that many donors in what a Washington Post writer describes as a “border town of stucco bungalows and weed-covered farm lots,” it does raise eyebrows from those who know the Democrat political history of Southeast Texas, and who remember the stealth donors from NYC’s Chinatown.
Good point, that. Read the whole thing.
It is dizzying how quickly the bad news has piled up against Hillary’s candidacy. Is it just me that senses Hillary gasping for air against Obama, yet is tempted to throw her a life line because she is more beatable in a General Election? As blatantly false and dishonest she is, Hillary seems to me to be an opponent who would be much easier for Republicans to defeat than would be Obama, despite his hard-left agenda. Obama would motivate his own “anti” demographic, and not one which I nor most other Republicans would wish to be associated with. But Hillary’s negatives seem to run much deeper among Conservatives and even non-Conservative Republicans. She seems to be almost universally despised by non-Democrats. On the other hand it is hard to find many Republicans who dislike Obama personally. He is charismatic and very telegenic. Oprah is about to go on a crusade for him. And Hillary is obviously fighting for her political life.
Don’t get me wrong: I agree with almost nothing Obama says he stands for, and his election could usher in one of the the most catastrophic chapters in American history. But he has all of the charisma and character that Hillary lacks. And that is scary in an electorate which seems to care more about how the candidate says something than it does what they are saying.
It makes one wonder who is behind all of these leaks of Hillary’s corrupt contributors. The fact that it is the Washington Post publishing this particular story is interesting in itself. Could it be that the sources are coming from within the Democrat party itself? It’s not out of the question.
Said Discerning Texan @ 11:30 pm Comments (3) | Permalink
Can you make one better? Hugh Hewitt is offering cash for a good one!
And…if you don’t have editing software, check this out.
Said xformed @ 4:41 pm Comments (3) | Permalink
Pelosi, Reid and Murtha
…we find Dihimmicrats discussing the plans to get out of Iraq.
Said GM @ 3:41 pm Comments (0) | Permalink
|
Said Cao @ 6:29 am Comments (0) | Permalink
|
Said Cao @ 6:14 am Comments (1) | Permalink
Dan Rather just doesn’t get it.
THR: But were the National Guard documents authentic?
Rather: I believe they are authentic. I believed it at the time, I believe it now.
Get that man some meds!
H/T lgf
Said GM @ 1:32 am Comments (0) | Permalink
|
Said Cao @ 1:41 pm Comments (1) | Permalink
|
Said Cao @ 9:47 am Comments (0) | Permalink
|
Said Cao @ 9:25 am Comments (1) | Permalink
It is growing increasingly clear that the Marxist Nutroot left is becoming more and more the dominant force in the Democrat party. The increasing heat from the MoveOn.org Left to actually try and impeach Bush and Cheney is obviously a sign that the party’s leadership is losing control of this runaway train. Is the self-destructiveness of the Democrats a positive development politically for Republicans? Sure it is.
Yet I have to go on record here as not agreeing with Michelle Malkin’s apparent inference in the above linked post that we should hope for impeachment proceedings to gain momentum, whether it would help Republicans or not. To distract a President with trumped up hysterical charges, as he conducts a War and tries to protect our citizens from further horrific attacks–a move which would have no chance whatsoever of succeeding in the Senate–would be perilous both for the country’s security and for the electorate’s trust in our system of Government… But, of course, for the Marxists on the Democrat Left, this is exactly why they want it to happen…).
I nevertheless do acknowledge her point that if the Dems were to make such a patently partisan and hysterical move as to attempt to impeach this President, it would definitely help Republicans in next year’s elections; after all this President:
Sure it might help Republicans if the Democrat leadership is imbecilic enough to push this forward; but would Impeachment now be good for the country? I say no: the means of getting that favorable political outcome are too fraught with risk. The Long War we are in is the most important conflict in our lifetimes; the heightened global tensions we face in places like Iran, Syria, Korea, are nearing critical mass; the precarious nature of the economy right now–all these are far too critical to the future of the country (and indeed, the World) to distract our Commander in Chief for such an outrageous display of blind partisanship.
Anyone who reads this blog regularly knows how I feel when Democrats reghave regularly put their party’s fortunes ahead of our country’s. The Financial Surveillance leaks, the Plame put-up job, Senators like Jay Rockefeller trying to sell their country’s security for purely partisan political gain–these are reprehensible, even treasonous actions.
Yes, I understand the Republican political maneuver last week, when they changed their votes to keep the Kucinich resolution alive, simply to embarrass the foolish Democrats who proposed it in the first place. I understand their intent was not to actually move towards impeachment. But with the nutroots pulling the strings to the extent that they are, even that maneuver was risky. It is difficult for me to imagine a scenario where it would be appropriate to try and impeach an American President in the middle of a War–unpopular or not. And it should not be cavalierly voted upon, by either party. Yes, if the Democrats are dumb enough to push this forward, it could well improve Republicans’ chances next year. But I have never argued here that putting the country at risk for purely partisan political gain is appropriate, and I am not going to start now.
Personally I think the nutroots have already begun to dig a deep enough hole for themselves that they might not come out of it unscathed. And impeachment proceedings at this moment in history is a really atrocious idea–not only for any sensible Democrats left out there in the ether who want to win next year, but also for the country as a whole. It should not be encouraged by any responsible citizen.
Said Discerning Texan @ 10:56 pm Comments (0) | Permalink
About The Writers
Bat Guano
Bear to the Right
Bloggin' Out Loud
Cao
Cracker
Crystal
Don Surber
Faultline USA
GM Roper
John Bambenek
Kat
Kender's Musings
LA Sunset
Maggie's Notebook
Mike's America
NIF
Ogre
Parrot Check
Richard Nixon
Rick Moran
Right For Scotland
RomeoCat
Rottweiler-Puppy
Smoke Eater
Sticks and Stones
TD @ The Right Track
The Mad Tech
The MaryHunter
The Wild Duck
Third World County
Truth and Reason
Uncle Jack
Van Helsing
Beware and watch for the
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
New Line Up!! Getting More Writers!!
None of this is written in stone. If any writer does not post in the designated spot, that time slot is rendered "open" and anyone registered as a write on this blog can post or cross-post from their blogs!
April
Monday, April 28
AM
PM
Tuesday, April 29
AM
PM
Wednesday, April 30
AM
PM
May
Thursday, May 1
AM
PM
Friday, May 2
AM
PM
Saturday, May 3
AM
PM
Sunday, May 4
After Action Briefing