<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just In Case You Thought The ACLU Was Bad&#8230;.</title>
	<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/05/26/just-in-case-you-thought-the-aclu-was-bad/</link>
	<description>Spreading Conservative ideas across the net.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: THE MIDNIGHT SUN &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BRITAIN&#8217;S A.C.L.U.</title>
		<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/05/26/just-in-case-you-thought-the-aclu-was-bad/#comment-638876</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 09:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/05/26/just-in-case-you-thought-the-aclu-was-bad/#comment-638876</guid>
					<description>[...] Britain&amp;#8217;s version of the A.C.L.U. &amp;#8220;Liberty&amp;#8221; may be even worse than the American organization (if that&amp;#8217;s possible). Here are some of their finer moments as listed by one blogger: That’s the thing, of course. Liberty’s definition of ‘human rights’ - just like ACLU’s - tends to be somewhat…. partial ? Slanted ? Completely howling-mad crazy ? Britain lacks anything as concise as the US Constitution, but let’s just take the First Amendment rights, and see how Liberty has defended them. How about freedom of speech ? What did Liberty say when countryside activist Robin Page was arrested by the police on bogus ‘hate crimes’ charges ? …. Well, OK, how about freedom of religion ? What about when an elderly couple were interrogated by police after asking for their local council to give equal prominence to Christian and homosexualist literature ? …. Nope, must have been busy then too. Press freedom ? Hmmm…. no luck there either. Come to think of it, Liberty couldn’t even bestir themselves for the bestest bogus ‘hate crimes’ story ever. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Britain&#8217;s version of the A.C.L.U. &#8220;Liberty&#8221; may be even worse than the American organization (if that&#8217;s possible). Here are some of their finer moments as listed by one blogger: That’s the thing, of course. Liberty’s definition of ‘human rights’ - just like ACLU’s - tends to be somewhat…. partial ? Slanted ? Completely howling-mad crazy ? Britain lacks anything as concise as the US Constitution, but let’s just take the First Amendment rights, and see how Liberty has defended them. How about freedom of speech ? What did Liberty say when countryside activist Robin Page was arrested by the police on bogus ‘hate crimes’ charges ? …. Well, OK, how about freedom of religion ? What about when an elderly couple were interrogated by police after asking for their local council to give equal prominence to Christian and homosexualist literature ? …. Nope, must have been busy then too. Press freedom ? Hmmm…. no luck there either. Come to think of it, Liberty couldn’t even bestir themselves for the bestest bogus ‘hate crimes’ story ever. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
