Comments on: US Soldiers would have shot at the Iranians http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/ Spreading Conservative ideas across the net. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:22:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Cao http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-516795 Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:04:31 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-516795 Glad to see you back, RDX. Glad to see you back, RDX.

]]> by: RDX http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-515839 Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:41:11 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-515839 U.S. soldiers would not only have shot AT the Iranians, they probably would have SHOT the Iranians! U.S. soldiers would not only have shot AT the Iranians, they probably would have SHOT the Iranians!

]]> by: Cao http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-509699 Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:49:58 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-509699 Actually, my shotgun rides in the bed of the truck.:twisted: Actually, my shotgun rides in the bed of the truck. :twisted:

]]> by: Goshdarnit http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-508865 Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:37:13 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-508865 Well Cao, in that case I believe you. You have my sincerest of apologies. Although, in the past, at least three of my posts have dissapeared. In future I'll try to find something else nasty to say about you that actually is true. :smile: "I hear Cao picks her nose with a shotgun!" Or maybe not. Fair enough Cao. Fair enough. Well Cao, in that case I believe you. You have my sincerest of apologies. Although, in the past, at least three of my posts have dissapeared. In future I’ll try to find something else nasty to say about you that actually is true. :smile: “I hear Cao picks her nose with a shotgun!” Or maybe not.

Fair enough Cao. Fair enough.

]]> by: Cao http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507323 Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:10:25 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507323 Yeah I like leaving the stupidity as it was written for posterity.  Goshdarnit doesn't always qualify as leaving stupid comments, but he's succeeded in the annoying category.  Not enough to have his comments nuked, and his IP banned though.  Just annoying enough for me to pause, snort, and move on to another post or comment...and leave the babysitting to Richard Nixon. I don't delete a single thing unless it's completely tasteless, rife with swearwords, insults and words that I don't dare utter out of my own mouth. OR, someone has gotten on my last nerve, and it takes quite a bit to accomplish that. I am much more indulgent, much more patient than people like -uh-er-<a rel="nofollow" href="http://bamapachyderm.com/">BETH</a>, for example. Beth doesn't take BS. I tend to take quite a bit more before I reach my limit. And I've been known to swear now and again, so it has to be pretty bad for me to relegate it to spam. goshdarnit manages to keep it pretty civil. It just seems to me that goshdarnit needs to direct complaints our way, which is fine, but I'd rather be accused of something I actually DID. Nixon can see everything back here, he has admin rights. Yeah I like leaving the stupidity as it was written for posterity.  Goshdarnit doesn’t always qualify as leaving stupid comments, but he’s succeeded in the annoying category.  Not enough to have his comments nuked, and his IP banned though.  Just annoying enough for me to pause, snort, and move on to another post or comment…and leave the babysitting to Richard Nixon.
I don’t delete a single thing unless it’s completely tasteless, rife with swearwords, insults and words that I don’t dare utter out of my own mouth. OR, someone has gotten on my last nerve, and it takes quite a bit to accomplish that. I am much more indulgent, much more patient than people like -uh-er-BETH, for example. Beth doesn’t take BS. I tend to take quite a bit more before I reach my limit.

And I’ve been known to swear now and again, so it has to be pretty bad for me to relegate it to spam. goshdarnit manages to keep it pretty civil.

It just seems to me that goshdarnit needs to direct complaints our way, which is fine, but I’d rather be accused of something I actually DID. Nixon can see everything back here, he has admin rights.

]]> by: Richard Nixon http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507277 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:54:11 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507277 Goshdarnit, is it "as usual" indicating we are deleting your posts? (Which I assure you on my part is not happening, the only posts of yours I change are those you ask a correction for) Or did you make this comment out of frustration and your posts disappearing in NOT so usual? By the way, Cao may not like you much, but unless you are a total ass and do nothing but swear, call names and insult, she probaby will not delete you or anyone else either. (and you may be an ass on occassion:razz:but you don't reach the level of insulting I am talking about:lol:) Goshdarnit, is it “as usual” indicating we are deleting your posts? (Which I assure you on my part is not happening, the only posts of yours I change are those you ask a correction for)

Or did you make this comment out of frustration and your posts disappearing in NOT so usual?

By the way, Cao may not like you much, but unless you are a total ass and do nothing but swear, call names and insult, she probaby will not delete you or anyone else either. (and you may be an ass on occassion :razz: but you don’t reach the level of insulting I am talking about :lol: )

]]> by: Cao http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507086 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:18:25 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-507086 There were three trackback spams in moderation; it looks like the blog ate it. Every now and then it eats someone's comments, sorry; I don't have any control over what akismet picks. There were three trackback spams in moderation; it looks like the blog ate it. Every now and then it eats someone’s comments, sorry; I don’t have any control over what akismet picks.

]]> by: Goshdarnit http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-506338 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:48:53 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-506338 For once I make a comment that does not dispute anything on this page, and as usual it dissapears. Accident, or incident? For once I make a comment that does not dispute anything on this page, and as usual it dissapears. Accident, or incident?

]]> by: Cao http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-504287 Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:58:56 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-504287 Ok, how is Bush acting like a fascist? That statement makes absolutely no sense. We actually play into the hands of fascists like Ahmadinejad by not towing the hard line and showing them, in their own language of jihad, STRENGTH with superior firepower.  If Bush were a fascist, none of the war protesters would be able to chant <em>1,2,3,4 we don't want your racist war</em>. They wouldn't be able to stand in the streets in their ridiculous clown outfits with 'impeach Bush' signs.  They'd be in jail; like the Iranian blogger. I think you're a little 'off' in your thinking and rationale....in this country, "intelligence" doesn't live up to the definition. Ok, how is Bush acting like a fascist?

That statement makes absolutely no sense. We actually play into the hands of fascists like Ahmadinejad by not towing the hard line and showing them, in their own language of jihad, STRENGTH with superior firepower.  If Bush were a fascist, none of the war protesters would be able to chant 1,2,3,4 we don’t want your racist war. They wouldn’t be able to stand in the streets in their ridiculous clown outfits with ‘impeach Bush’ signs.  They’d be in jail; like the Iranian blogger.

I think you’re a little ‘off’ in your thinking and rationale….in this country, “intelligence” doesn’t live up to the definition.

]]> by: brettbum http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-503748 Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:10:51 +0000 http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/03/26/us-soldiers-would-have-shot-at-the-iranians/#comment-503748 I would argue that yes we do and should have the right to defend ourselves. As a former intelligence analyst I also think we were right to take Sadam out. I do also think that Bush is not only acting like a fascist, but he is acting like a fascist that is completely inept, which is possibly his only saving grace. I look forward to the day when there is a real conservative in the White House and not someone that panders to the religious right out of one side of his mouth and issues orders that do not get the job done right out of the other side of his mouth. If Hitler had been so inept, he would have never found the Rhine. Unfortunately, Bush's fascists precidents will make for much fodder when liberals take over the White House in 2008. Ask yourself if you want a liberal operating with the powers that Bush has allowed himself and then tell me that his actions have been good for the country. Clinton was a leader with bad ideas, but the capability to persuade people to do something. Bush is a leader with good ideas, but completely incapable of getting those ideas accomplished successfully. I would argue that yes we do and should have the right to defend ourselves.

As a former intelligence analyst I also think we were right to take Sadam out.

I do also think that Bush is not only acting like a fascist, but he is acting like a fascist that is completely inept, which is possibly his only saving grace.

I look forward to the day when there is a real conservative in the White House and not someone that panders to the religious right out of one side of his mouth and issues orders that do not get the job done right out of the other side of his mouth.

If Hitler had been so inept, he would have never found the Rhine.

Unfortunately, Bush’s fascists precidents will make for much fodder when liberals take over the White House in 2008.

Ask yourself if you want a liberal operating with the powers that Bush has allowed himself and then tell me that his actions have been good for the country.

Clinton was a leader with bad ideas, but the capability to persuade people to do something.

Bush is a leader with good ideas, but completely incapable of getting those ideas accomplished successfully.

]]>