Al Bore wins an Oscare (intentional misspelling) for his socialist propaganda film and claims that we must act now to save the planet. “It’s not a political issue it’s a moral issue” he claimed.
One might expect that the high priest of such a “moral issue” requiring radical change in the lifestyle of most Americans would lead the way.
So it was with interest that we learned yesterday that Gore’s Nashville home uses the amount of electricity which could fuel the homes of 20 average American families.
And we’re also reminded that Gore, who owns three homes, had a zinc mine on one of his properties polluting nearby waterways and has the motion picture company which distributes his film pay for the carbon offsets his use of private jets require.
We can only conclude that Gore is immoral and another example of a “Do As I Say, Not As I Do” liberal.
President Bush Goes Green: Environmentalists Hate Him
Meanwhile, President Bush’s Prairie Chapel Ranch is a model of eco-friendly design. Waste water is recycled for irrigation, geothermal energy is used for heating and cooling. It’s a model for modern living as described by one of the same left wing web sites that hates President Bush and insists he wants to poison the water and the air.
That contrast alone should unmask the true motivations of the left. It’s not about the environment, it’s about enshrining socialist control of energy, the economy and lifestyles. Not the environment.
Scientists Not on the Socialist Payroll Dump On Gore’s Film
“Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it,” Al Gore sensibly asserts in his film “An Inconvenient Truth”…
Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment: “Gore’s circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention.”
Carter does not pull his punches about Gore’s activism, “The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science.”
Institut Pasteur (Paris) Professor Paul Reiter seemed to sum up the sentiments of many experts when he labeled the film “pure, mind-bending propaganda.”
More scientist reaction to the “film” here.
Patrick Michael’s Take on expanding Arctic ice here.
Something very much like the above also posted at Mike’s America.
Said Mike's America @ 11:27 am | Permalink
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, website trumps email, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
[…] […]
Pingback by Chaotic Synaptic Activity » Heh…. — 2/27/2007 @ 1:15 pm
The left here in the U.S. hates Bush so much, that they will contradict themselves without any knowledge of doing so, blinded by jealousy, hate and anger. We don’t have to go that far back to see where the Dems opposed the idea of pollution credits of any kind.(After all, the term “carbon credits” is a new name for “pollution credits”) All one has to do is run a Google search on “Democrats oppose polution credits” and you will have well over a million links. True environmentalists (as I consider myself) see this as nothing more than a sin tax for elitists to pollute any way they like without worry.
Comment by TonyB — 2/27/2007 @ 1:27 pm
This is priceless…..get some teachers up there….poor bears….
Comment by Richard Nixon — 2/27/2007 @ 6:04 pm
Al Bore.
Comment by Cao — 2/27/2007 @ 7:27 pm
To paraphrase John Kerry: “You know polar bears, if you work hard, study and are smart you do well, if you don’t, you get stuck on an ice floe during global warming.”
Comment by Mike's America — 2/27/2007 @ 10:51 pm