<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAR:  Europe, The MSM, and Others Flunk Psychology 101</title>
	<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/</link>
	<description>Spreading Conservative ideas across the net.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Carol</title>
		<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121773</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121773</guid>
					<description>So what would you have them do?  If they catch the ones involved in the burning of the embassy they will be jailed.  If the French catch the murderer of the Paris man he or they will be jailed and if not citizens likely deported.  So seriously other than talking tough what would you have them do?

You think MSM backed down?  What over the cartoons?  The Danes didn't just publish those cartoons they solicited them.  Yep that sounds like backing down.  Then several months later France and Germany had to jump on the bandwagon and republish them-more backing down.  Then with rioting going on in scores of countries even more newspapers in Australia, Russia etc printed samples of the cartoons.  Oh lets see in Russia one newspaper was closed.  Wow.  Who would have expected that in Russia.  Are you saying the papers and the heads of governments should all be talking tough talk?  That only works if you are going to back it up with tough actions.  The problem is most western countries have laws that limit the actions you can take to legal actions.  Are you advocating a double standard perhaps whereby we have one set of laws for non-muslims and a different more stringent set for muslims?  If not I don't see what actions can be taken that doesn't measure up to appeasement in your book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what would you have them do?  If they catch the ones involved in the burning of the embassy they will be jailed.  If the French catch the murderer of the Paris man he or they will be jailed and if not citizens likely deported.  So seriously other than talking tough what would you have them do?</p>
<p>You think MSM backed down?  What over the cartoons?  The Danes didn&#8217;t just publish those cartoons they solicited them.  Yep that sounds like backing down.  Then several months later France and Germany had to jump on the bandwagon and republish them-more backing down.  Then with rioting going on in scores of countries even more newspapers in Australia, Russia etc printed samples of the cartoons.  Oh lets see in Russia one newspaper was closed.  Wow.  Who would have expected that in Russia.  Are you saying the papers and the heads of governments should all be talking tough talk?  That only works if you are going to back it up with tough actions.  The problem is most western countries have laws that limit the actions you can take to legal actions.  Are you advocating a double standard perhaps whereby we have one set of laws for non-muslims and a different more stringent set for muslims?  If not I don&#8217;t see what actions can be taken that doesn&#8217;t measure up to appeasement in your book.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GM</title>
		<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121770</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121770</guid>
					<description>Carol, the appeasement is all  in the news.  Read about the backing down of the MSM, read about the caterwauling of the EU heads of government, read about the Paris police saying it doesn't appear to be anti-semitism in the murder of a jewish youth.  Read about the act of war (burning the Danish Embassy) for which the Danes did nothing.  This is appeasement and is no less so than Neville Chamberlains.  Why do you think the islamofascists are continuing their war of attrition?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol, the appeasement is all  in the news.  Read about the backing down of the MSM, read about the caterwauling of the EU heads of government, read about the Paris police saying it doesn&#8217;t appear to be anti-semitism in the murder of a jewish youth.  Read about the act of war (burning the Danish Embassy) for which the Danes did nothing.  This is appeasement and is no less so than Neville Chamberlains.  Why do you think the islamofascists are continuing their war of attrition?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carol</title>
		<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121768</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121768</guid>
					<description>Those that use violence jail them or deport them. This I can understand.  Those that threaten violence, ok I understand that too so long as you are not talking about demonstrations.  If they get too rowdy while demonstrating jail is a fine place for them and as long as they aren't citizens go ahead and deport them.  Of course in our country we would do this.  They do the same in Europe.  We, nor Europe, have taken to jaling or deporting folks based strictly on their religion but limit those actions to ones actually engaging in violence.  So what do you mean by appeasement? What do you think is being appeased when jailing or deporting would be more appropriate aside from committing acts of violence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those that use violence jail them or deport them. This I can understand.  Those that threaten violence, ok I understand that too so long as you are not talking about demonstrations.  If they get too rowdy while demonstrating jail is a fine place for them and as long as they aren&#8217;t citizens go ahead and deport them.  Of course in our country we would do this.  They do the same in Europe.  We, nor Europe, have taken to jaling or deporting folks based strictly on their religion but limit those actions to ones actually engaging in violence.  So what do you mean by appeasement? What do you think is being appeased when jailing or deporting would be more appropriate aside from committing acts of violence?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glen</title>
		<link>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121767</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2006/02/26/europe-the-msm-and-others-flunk-psychology-101/#comment-121767</guid>
					<description>You're asking alot from people that are unable to see the consequences of their own actions. When peace in the present is all that matters, rewarding bad behavior makes sense. For my take on this, go &lt;a href=&quot;http://stickandstone.blogspot.com/2006/02/muslim-control.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re asking alot from people that are unable to see the consequences of their own actions. When peace in the present is all that matters, rewarding bad behavior makes sense. For my take on this, go <a href="http://stickandstone.blogspot.com/2006/02/muslim-control.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
