All I wanted for Christmas was international borders for the United States. You know, those old, archaic things that define where one country ends and another begins. They used to be pretty common, but anti-Americans (also known as progressives) oppose them, and few politicians have the guts to enforce them, so the U.S. really doesn’t have any today.

However, just before Christmas, I got half my present — The Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. This good bill passed the House, but faces quite a bit of doubt in the Democrat/RINO/Obstructionist Senate.

This bill’s primary purpose is to secure the U.S. Borders. Why could anyone be opposed to that? As usual, just follow the money. Did you know that Mexico’s #1 source of income for it’s economy is Mexicans bringing money in from America? Do you know how much money is spent by the US government in Mexico? Do you realize how many billions of dollars can be spent by politicians as long as immigrants are illegally entering the US?

For example, Hillary Clinton, socialist pretending to be American, wants very badly to be president and to control and nationalize all health care. That will give her great control and power — things she and other politicians simply live for. If they can keep immigrants coming in, health care will continue to have trouble, and they will be able to nationalize health care. So this type of politician will never oppose illegal immigration.

One part of this new law would build a 700-mile fence along the border that will reduce illegal crossings. They know this type of fence will work to reduce criminals from crossing the border because where it’s been tried, it works.

Of course, those in the mainstream media, who support illegal immigration, are asking what to do with the 10 million or more criminals currently in the country illegally. The obvious answer, and one that Tom Tancredo is working on, is to punish the companies that are illegally hiring the criminals to work for them. There is a simple system in place to verify that a company who hires people only hires U.S. Citizens. It’s voluntary, but it should be required.

Once the illegals couldn’t get jobs, the next step would be to deny them benefits. If they’re not getting free education and free health care (paid for by hard-working citizens), and they can’t find a job, they’ll go home or enter legally. Of course, if that doesn’t work, I have a backup plan for them:

Said Ogre @ 8:28 am Comments (9) | Permalink   

Linked here is my favorite story of the preceding year.
It highlights the idiocy of the (lack of) thought processes of the liberal mind.

It is the story of St. James Davis, his wife Ladonna and a chimp named Moe.

The links in the original story are, of course, long dead, but news never dies, it just gets archived.

T short story of this is that they (the Davis’) had a chimp that got put in a chimp home, they went to visit and other chimps got loose and attacked them, and while he was being attacked he “was trying to reason with them,” according to his wife, who went on to say druing an appearance on Good Morning America, “You can’t discriminate. We don’t know about [their] background or childhood.”

I want to point out that phrase. “You can’t discriminate. We don’t know about [their] background or childhood,”.

Did you get that? Maybe these chimps had “bad childhoods” and THAT is why they were attacking her husband.

See? Now it all makes sense. Maybe if a wild animal attacks you and he suffered from a “bad childhood” you can TALK him out of trying to kill you.

Their attorney, Gloria Allred had this tp say when asked if the Davis couple were done playing with large wild animals that could kill you; (from the original article)

“But LaDonna Davis said she will keep loving chimpanzees, saying it is unfair to say all chimps are dangerous because of the actions of these two.”

Now is it me or is this the same kind of claptrap that I hear about radical islamic terrorists?

Is this not the same line of reasoning we hear from the left constantly about “reasoning” with the animals that want to destroy us and saw our heads off in the name of allah (peas be upon him)?

Is anyone else out there seeing a pattern? Does this not sound like the same kind of shiite that constantly spills from the mouths of the appeasers in europe and here?

As I said, this is a sad story, and I do feel sorry for the man, but I can’t help but think that maybe he made a bad choice, maybe trying to “reason” with an animal that goes on instinct will earn you the asskicking, or the mauling, or even the beheading that you deserve.

So that is my personal favorite post of the year folks. It has all of the elements that perfectly illustrate the idiocy of the left, which is something we should continue to focus on, especially since 2006 is an midterm election year and if this country has any hope of surviving we must keep the appeasing socialist out of power and Protect and Defend all that has made this country great.

Happy New Year.

Said Kender @ 10:23 am Comments (0) | Permalink   

A good friend of mine, The Real Ugly American (click on the link, there is some good reading there) went on vacation and asked me (and another dude) to put up a few posts for him while he was gone. We both graciously agreed to do so, then found out that we were gonna root for different teams for the National Collegiate Football Championship. Well, that started a rivalry and below is my latest entry in that rivalry.

Not very long ago, I posted this graphic of the University of Texas Longhorn, with TEXAS superimposed above it:

Not willing to let things slide, some worthy, but ultimately losing USC fan posted on this very same blog this graphic:

Kind of puny as graphics go, only 150 pixels wide and a mere 200 tall. Nothing like my robust 250 pixel wide and 225 pixel tall graphic of the GREAT TEXAS LONGHORN

But I digress. The real reason my worthy (but ultimately gonna lose fellow conservative and otherwise brilliant) blogger bud posted such a small graphic is because if you enlarge the graphic to where you can see what is going on, you see this:

You really can’t blame him though, who wants to publicize that the TROJAN mascot is rooting for TEXAS?

HOOK ‘EM HORNS!

As I said, mosey over to The Real Ugly American and when TRUA comes back and enjoy his blog, he and his blog buds have some great reading (but you be sure and come back now, ya’ hear?)

Xposted at GM’s Corner

Said GM @ 8:35 pm Comments (8) | Permalink   

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU

NEW YORK – In a full-page advertisement in today’s New York Times, the American Civil Liberties Union intensified its call for a special counsel to be appointed to determine whether President George W. Bush violated federal wiretapping laws by authorizing illegal surveillance.

The ACLU said President Bush’s actions were a clear violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which was passed by Congress in response to revelations that former President Nixon was using “national security” claims to spy on American citizens he considered his “enemies.”

“President Nixon was not above the law and neither is President Bush,” said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. “President Bush cannot use a claim of seeking to preserve our nation to undermine the rules that serve as our foundation. The Attorney General, who may have been involved with the formulation of this policy, must appoint a special counsel to let justice be served.”

The advertisement, as well as a similar ACLU ad that ran last Thursday, was spurred by revelations earlier this month that Bush authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct electronic surveillance of people within the United States, including U.S. citizens, without a warrant.

The text of today’s advertisement compares the words of President Nixon and President Bush, both of whom denied allegations of illegal spying. Next to the image of Nixon, the advertisement says: “He lied to the American people and broke the law.” Below that is an image of President Bush, with the words, “So did he.”

The FISA wiretapping law made it a crime to intentionally engage in electronic surveillance without court approval. The president clearly violated the law when he authorized, and then repeatedly reauthorized, the NSA to spy on Americans without first obtaining a warrant, the ACLU said.

In a formal request sent last week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the ACLU called for the appointment of “an outside special counsel with the independence to investigate and prosecute any and all criminal acts committed by any member of the Executive Branch in the warrantless electronic surveillance of people in the United States over the past four years by the NSA,” noting that “such crimes are serious felonies and they need to be fully and independently investigated.”

It makes me sick. Groups like the the ACLU and CAIR wanting sensitive, classified information released is as irresponsible a position as I can think of. It would only lead to our enemies obtaining the information, and avoid the trap. Perhaps this is what the ACLU wants.

It isn’t what the vast amount of Americans want. Michelle Malkin points out the latest Rasmussen Reports.

Sixty-four percent (64%) of Americans believe the National Security Agency (NSA) should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects in other countries and people living in the United States. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that just 23% disagree.

Notice that the ACLU have already made up their mind that Bush is guilty? This is nothing but a political hit piece.

Via a commenter at Free Republic:

The problem is that groups such as the ACLU are hitting the airwaves and print media demanding an investigation into the Bush admin. Meanwhile Repubs are not demanding an investigation into WHO leaked this info. We need to get the message out loud and clear cause it doesn’t look like our Congress critters are going to. Sign the petition calling for an investigation into the national security leaks!

Said Jay777 @ 1:03 pm Comments (14) | Permalink   

NOLA police shot and killed a man after he threatened them with a knife in a videotaped standoff. The man not only refused to put down the knife, even after being maced by the officers, but he then lunged at one of the policemen, who then promptly ended his life.

So what’s the big deal?

MSNBC is trying to turn this into the next Rodney King. I wonder how long it will take for someone to mention the fact that there were white officers involved and the suspect was a black man. It just happened…give it some time.

Check out this exchange between MSNBC and the NOLA Chief of Police in the Totally Exclusive Interview(tm):

JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL, GUEST HOST: I guess a lot of people are simply wondering why this man had to die. Why didn’t the police just incapacitate him?

CHIEF WARREN RILEY, NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT: Why didn’t we incapacitate him?

VELEZ-MITCHELL: Shoot him in the leg, for example.

RILEY: Well, I think our officers gave him every opportunity and every option to put the weapon down. We used force other than our weapons, as it relates to using the mace, which had no effect on the subject. Officers were extremely patient, giving him verbal instructions numerous times, until the person actually raised the knife and lunged at a police officer, at which time he was shot.

VELEZ-MITCHELL: Well, I don’t want to sound like I’m second guessing because it’s easy to ask questions sitting in a chair here. You’re out there in the field. A lot of people are wondering why not shoot him in the leg, or for example, taser guns? I understand that your department, the officers do not carry taser guns. Why not?

Because if they’re not dead, they can still kill you, oh Jane of the nonexistent logical powers. Notice that she says herself, “I don’t want to sound like I’m second guessing,” yet she plunges right on anyway, doing exactly that.

The moral of this story is, as long as you pretend to care and fake having a clue, you can say what you like and all the moonbats will cheer because they’re not bright enough to know any better. Wait. Code Pink already taught us that.

Never mind.

Crossposted at Euphoric Reality.

Said Kit Jarrell @ 2:42 pm Comments (9) | Permalink   

Picking it up from where we left off, let’s keep ripping up Mariah Blake’s garbage hit piece from the Smear Jack Cabal on Idema called “Tin Soldier”.

After leaving active-duty service, Idema ran a series of businesses related to special operations — including a counterterrorism training school and a traveling special-operations exposition — in partnership with another former Green Beret, Thomas Bumback. During this period, which spanned the 1980s and early ’90s, he claims to have been involved in a series of “black ops,” or secret military missions.

Interestingly, I stumbled across the story of Jack inventing the Demon STABO extraction harness. It was an update from the Vietnam one and is the one that Jack is putting on Paddy Baker in the picture below which is also on the www.superpatriots.us/jacksback.htm webpage. Jack’s version, designed in the early 80’s or very late 70’s is still the primary exfil harness for Rangers, SEALS, and Delta Force today.

Yeah. THAT’s a taste of the true history of Idema in SF. The more that comes out, the more I discover how the story coverage on Idema has been slanted in a horrible and derogatory manner. I notice how these little details that support his long history in SF is simply omitted.

Instead, you do not only smear Idema, but you also take a stab at Bumback, one of the most loyal, honorable guys–who has a devastating knowledge of not only SF Ops but of the gear that they need to succeed and the designs that would improve that gear. That’s what those trade shows were all about, and you were told about that in detail, having met with Bumback personally on your all-expenses-paid-trip to North Carolina. Interestingly, however, the pretenses under which you met with him were false, and the things he told you about you omitted in this piece–including the info you obtained by watching 10 minutes of video footage which explained exactly what they were doing. These guys were ahead of their time! The designs they were proposing for the gear that SF Ops uses ultimately would increase an operator’s effectiveness in the field! Putting the end user in touch with manufacturers so that the manufacturers understood exactly what they needed and why, is a brilliant concept–and not only that–but they also had the capability to USE the equipment! USE the scuba gear in a pool, drive a vehicle, etc..

ummm…you wouldn’t be referring to the time frame in which these pictures were taken, would you? I mean since he was thrown out of the army in the ’70’s for being an “unremarkable” rear radio operator and all.

Idema as a principle Senior Instructor the the British 22 SAS Commandos. He is seen here placing a STABO extraction harness (that he designed) on Colonel Patty Baker- the British SAS Commando who became legendary during the battle of Oman. Colonel Baker later wrote of Idema as the finest young Green Beret he had ever worked with and invited Idema to SAS Headquarters in Hereford in the mid-80’s. The rope you see is attached to a hovering helicopter. In other words Colonel Baker was trusting Idema with his life.

With Ronald Reagan as the President from 1980 until 1988, clandestine and covert Ops, as was Special Forces, were at an all time high. Idema formed the Counter-Terrorist Group, and developed counter-terrorist and hostage rescue concepts and doctrine which would be followed by counter-terrorist units all over the world. He is seen here training the President’s son, Ronald Reagan, Jr., in combat pistol techniques.

Idema being awarded Royal Thai Commando Wings in 1985 by the Commander of the Thai Special Warfare Command in LopBuri Thailand. The man on the left is holding a Royal award device reserved for awards authorized by the King. The row of men standing are all Thai General Officers. This picture was taken in 1985 when there were supposed to be no Green Berets in South East Asia.

He was also compiling a long arrest record on charges including bad checks, assault, possession of stolen property, and discharging a firearm into a dwelling. Then, in 1994, Idema was tried and convicted of defrauding fifty-eight companies of about $260,000, according to The Fayetteville Observer. He served three years in prison. It was while awaiting sentencing that Idema launched his first media offensive, trying to sell a story about nuclear material being smuggled out of Russia. Gary Scurka, an investigative journalist and recipient of numerous prestigious awards, eventually produced a 60 Minutes piece based, at least in part, on information Idema had provided.

*yawn*…the charge was “aiding and abetting” and the principles were let go. Idema has not only spent over $1 million in that case to clear his name, and he paid the fine even though he maintains he didn’t do it. That says volumes to me in terms of the validity of the charges, yet he spent 3 years in jail for something he didn’t do. His ex-wife says he didn’t do it, and people who know him and knew him during that period also are of that opinion.

As far as discharging a firearm into a dwelling, I suppose that would appeal to all the gun control advocates and anti-military people out there, but those are the kind of people this piece are aimed at, isn’t it?

The situation with the “bad checks” is quite interesting, because that had to do with a certain PI/felon by the name of Hagler who is only in this for the money. As a matter of fact, I would credit some of what’s beginning to happen to me in terms of a report run from Autotrack and the information gleaned from that report showing up on a website- as a result of my reporting this story. This is the type of underhanded methods the other side uses to prevent the truth from coming out. Can you imagine? They don’t have facts to back up their claims about Idema, so they resort to name-calling, threats of lawsuits, and dredging up what they perceive is dirt in my past. Let’s make one thing perfectly clear; ANYTHING they dredge up about me, my family, or my past is totally irrelevant to the Idema story. Focus on what’s relevant, people, and tune out the noise.

Over the next decade, Idema continued to court the media with help from a faithful cadre of friends — among them Scurka, the best-selling author Robin Moore, and Edward Caraballo, the cameraman who would later be imprisoned with Idema in Afghanistan. He met with little success, though, until September 11, 2001, when a shell-shocked public, desperate to make sense of the senseless, began groping for information. Idema gladly obliged.

The is disingenuous. There are many SF operators who can attest to his version of events. To make it seem as though he’s the only one telling these stories is a terrible distortion of facts.

On September 12, 2001, Idema appeared on KTTV, Los Angeles’s Fox affiliate, which billed him as a “counterterrorism adviser.” He told audiences that three Canadian jetliners might have been hijacked, along with the four U.S. planes. By late October, Idema was in Afghanistan, telling associates that he planned to help two humanitarian groups — Partners International Foundation and Knightsbridge International — distribute food to hungry Afghans, and he brought along a National Geographic film crew, headed by Scurka, to make a film about his efforts. (Both aid groups say he misrepresented his plans in order to get them to cooperate.)

That is, in fact, what he did. He didn’t “misrepresent” his plans at all. From what I gather as far as the desiccants story is concerned, many of the players involved tried to take credit for what Jack did in that humanitarian effort.

From Dan, a Special forces operator who knows Jack personally:

If you check the early October 2001 Reports from the DOD, I think you will find that it was the DOD PAO and an ASD who stated at a PRESS CONFERENCE that THEY believed the Taliban was poisoning the airdrops in Northern Afghanistan (I was already in the ISOFAC preparing to deploy when we were briefed on it).

During the press conference the DOD was defending dropping food and not bombs on Northern Afghanistan, which was of course the RIGHT thing to do because these people were, and are still, our allies, even if the American State Department has now deserted them and has us working with the new ANA (a joke of a Keystone Cop army).

The press and the NGOs were spreading unsubstantiated rumors and propaganda by the bushel basket. If the propaganda was successful then the Northern Alliance would think we were trying to poison them and fight against them. We could have easily lost them as a trusted ally, endangering all of the small 10 to 12 man SF teams which were just about to arrive on the ground. The HDR food packs were also yellow and resembled Soviet air drop mines. This was just one of the many problems. Jack Idema went into Northern Afghanistan with a primary mission to find out who WAS poisoning the food drops and to get more food drops to the Northern Alliance and get the right kind of food landing on actual drop zones instead of USAF “blind drops.” This was secretly coordinated by the DAT at both the American and Afghan Embassies in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.

Jack Idema found out the real cause of the poisoning and HDR problems. Idema FIXED the problem single handily, through initiative, ingenuity, and pure guts.

One night he set up an ambush on an HDR airdrop site expecting to engage the Taliban “poison saboteurs.” Instead Idema saw airdrops hitting allied mud huts and landing in minefields where children would then run into so they could collect their “presents” from America. He got that word back to DOD and USASOC asap.

I don’t think anyone that was truly in Northern Afghanistan can overlook the positive impact that Idema had on allied relations. So powerful that on Northern Alliance commander, who’s entire family had been killed by a US bombing in error, and then promised revenge against America, did not just embrace Idema, he actually became his chief bodyguard and fought next to him for months. It is my understanding from one of Massoud’s bodyguards that the same commander remains his close friend today.

Idema’s original HDR CRISIS report transmitted from Northern Afghanistan to Task Force Dagger Headquarters, USASOC, USSOCOM, SECDEF Rumsfeld, and General Powell, resulted in saving many lives, and completely changed the airdrop policy. It is also my understanding, from a third party source, that Major James Morris, who you interviewed, knew all about this because he was friends with Powell’s speechwriter, Joe Galloway (same fellow from General Hal Moore’s WE WERE SOLDIERS book and film). Another person who knew the story was a Special Forces Captain at the Counter-Terrorist Task Force, Kevin or Ken Harington, I think.

Major Jim Morris (probably more Purple Hearts and Bronze Stars in Vietnam then any General), was credited by Idema in a cable to TFD HQ as coming up with the idea to airdrop rice bags in larger wheat bags, so that when the rice exploded on impact it was contained by the outer bag instead of disappearing into the sand (quote from actual cable: “Major Jim Morris and General Hienie Aderholt used this technique in Vietnam when they were airdropping rice to Montagnards in the mountains of Vietnam- if it worked then it will work now so send the HDRs to Bosnia and drop us rice.”).

This solved the problem of the new airdrops and even the South African UN World Food Program pilots sent their thanks and accolades to Idema. After similar problems happened in Bamian, Idema briefed the team there and SOCEUR started doing the same thing with USAF drops there.

The way I see it is total jealousy. Everyone within a hundred miles wants to take credit for what Idema did, not just on the HDR investigation and resolution of the crisis, but on anything else they can.

Robert Morris (NOT Jim Morris) slightly rewrote Idema’s HDR report, put his name on it, and then submitted it (certainly that was illegal) for a USAID million dollar grant to his phony aid group “Partners International.” I still have a copy of the original report written by Idema but it is FOUO (marked For Official Use Only), so you can FOIA the real report from DOD PAO ASD (dated Nov. 4, 2001). Compare the two and you will puke. Robert Morris was even stupid enough to use pictures of Idema in it (he still has it downloadable on the Partners International website).

Ed Artis, who tried desperately to meet and “hang out” with SF teams in Northern Afghanistan, also claimed he “did it.” (Skurka, who you mention, should be asked about this, he was there, as was DIA LTC Long- who was not really “retired” at the time).

A mousy little USA Today reporter, Tim something, also tried to take credit for it in USA Today. Little Timmy got caught leaving Afghanistan with stolen art objects and smuggling antiquities, but USA Today never told you that story did they? I was at Bagram when that happened, and it was only him getting on his knees and crying that saved him from jail that day. Later he claimed the Afghans “robbed” him of his purchases. He was obviously smoking too much hash (also found on him that day).

Make no mistake about it, four of the men on my team currently here in Afghanistan know for absolute fact that Jack Idema’s version of the HDR story is true.

Idema, a stocky man who even in the Afghan hinterlands kept his salt-and-pepper hair died black, quickly adopted a quasi-military look — dark sunglasses, dust-colored fatigues, a black-and-white kaffiyeh draped around his neck. The style reflected his expanding repertoire of roles. Along with the human rights work and the documentary making, he claimed he was offering military advice to the Northern Alliance, which was fighting the Taliban. Meanwhile, he sold a variety of services to reporters, telling them he was Donald Rumsfeld’s special representative to the Northern Alliance, or insinuating that he was working for the CIA or the Army Special Forces.

bwahahahaha! Whatever.

Jack leading a patrol of Afghan MOD and Ministry of Interior Troops during the 2002 War. From Rotty Pup: Here we see Idema leading a column of Afghan Ministry of Interior troops in 2002. Doubtless, it was the sunglasses and gun that fooled the large number of government soldiers into following him. After all, we’re sure this kind of thing happens all the time. You know, an American guy turns up at the barracks and everyone just follows him out for a quick romp across the desert. Why, Idema must have felt like a kind of heavily-armed Pied Piper. Hmm.

From Rotty Pup: Apparently not content with working these miraculous deceptions on credulous Iraqi and German troops, this time Jack’s convinced top Afghan Corps Commanders of his legitimacy. From left to right: 1- Afghan CIA officer (required to be cropped out of picture before publication), 2) General Wassiq - Mazar, 3) Jack, 4) General Daoud - Kunduz & Taliqon, 5) General Atta - Mazar, 6, General Hazrat Ali - Jalalabad, 7) General Gulhaider- Southern Front command. Apparently, the military top brass on show here all believed they were meeting to coordinate Idema’s operations throughout Afghanistan. It’s a good thing the chattering classes who run the BBC were around to put them straight!

Thanks, Mariah, your “setting us straight” has just sent your credibility to the tank. If I were you, I’d start sending out my resume to the National Inquirer and Star Magazine, since they can use your kind of talent and the impeccable standards of journalism and ethics that you’ve demonstrated throughout this piece. Columbia School of Journalism ought to have pictures of People, Star, and the National Inquirer to prepare students for the incredible future they have lying ahead of them.

By December, Idema was serving as a commentator for Fox News, which paid him $500 per appearance, and charging journalists $1,000 a head for tours to Tora Bora, the sprawling cave complex where U.S. forces were battling Al Qaeda troops. According to reporters, the trips included press conferences with Idema himself. Some of Idema’s media schemes showed extraordinary enterprise. In one case, he reportedly lured a local warlord named Hazrat Ali to the Spin Ghar Hotel in Jalalabad for a press briefing and charged reporters $100 each to attend. It later emerged that he had told Ali that the journalists were Pentagon officials.

Is this paragraph a joke? Jack’s “scheming”, lol, “lured a warlord”..lol..like we’re supposed to swallow the bs that all of these people were “duped” by the guy with the sunglasses. Generals, members of Parliament, the whole nine yards. And I’m the queen of England.

At a press conference with General Hazrat Ali in December 2002- Hazrat Ali is one of the smartest men in Afghanistan, and one of America’s best friends– he gave press conferences weekly, sometimes daily, but Mariah Blake wants you to believe that Jack conned not only the reporters, but Hazrat Ali himself- yeah, right. Hazrat Ali is STILL one of Jack’s good friends. But Mariah Blake would have you believe that guy with the sunglasses sure is some slick New Yorker! (The press also claimed that Jack was publicity hungry during the war– TRY to find this picture ever before with Jack in it. Not possible. Jack had himself cut from all pics that day, and the only agreement the press there made, contrary to lies by stupid journalists we are sure Jack will see in court one day, is that they would agree not to have Jack in their pictures- check the book THE HUNT FOR BIN LADEN - Jack is clipped OUT of the picture)

It should also be worth noting that the Afghan people in many cases are starving. American business’ entrance and existence in Afghanistan has driven the price of goods and services through the roof. That in itself has not been a good thing for Afghans who only make about $50.00 a month. Could it be that the price of admission was the AFGHAN price of admission rather than money that would go into Jack’s pocket? Considering all that I’ve learned, I’m inclined to believe that would be the case.

Here’s yet another example of Jack “fooling” people in Tora Bora.

It’s not difficult to understand why Idema — a self-proclaimed government operative with a silver tongue, striking looks, and a love of the spotlight — would appeal to reporters who, in late 2001, poured into war-ravaged Afghanistan desperate for stories. The war was being fought largely by Special Forces soldiers, who call themselves “quiet professionals” and assiduously avoid the press. Lack of information bred a sense of urgency. “The media were in a frenzy,” explains Artis of Knightsbridge International. “They were interviewing each other about what they’d interview someone about if they had someone to interview.” Idema also seems to have capitalized on the U.S. military’s increasing reliance on contractors, and the confusion over who had authority to speak on the government’s behalf.

hehehe “self proclaimed government operative”. The pictures so far have completely refuted that allegation. And “silver tongue”?…”striking looks”? ….”love of the spotlight”?…there are many times when he had himself cut out of pictures, and was standing out of view of the camera. Now, though, it appears as though he’s been trying tell the story that those in the media have failed so miserably to do; Jack has witnessed these events firsthand and is friends with some incredible people–not the least of which are people like Yunus Qanuni, Hazrat Ali, and General Fahim and even General Dostum and many other high ranking generals and now officials in parliament.

The only people in a frenzy were Bob Morris of Partners International because Jack wouldn’t write up the report in order for him to be able to send his people into Afghanistan and start capitalizing on the humanitarian aid going in–and Ed Artis, because the publicity that seemed to be generated as a result of Jack’s efforts didn’t mention him, his phony Knights of Malta, and Knightsbridge. Both of them have a monetary angle, and both of them stood to benefit if they could manipulate Jack to do what they wanted in terms of their phony “humanitarian” causes. Joe Cafasso, of course, was maneuvering to get his hands on the Al Qaeda tapes, but nobody has complained about his talk of assassinating Jack in order to get his mits on them. The depiction of Jack being money-hungry and publicity hungry over all of this is COMPLETELY disingenuous, from what I can see.

In addition to courting reporters, Idema sometimes threatened them. Tod Robberson of The Dallas Morning News reported that Idema shot at him “point-blank” during an argument. And some journalists were put off by his violent tendencies and overblown swagger. A group of photographers referred to Idema, who adopted the nickname “Jack” in Afghanistan, as Jack Shit.

Wow, we’re supposed to believe that Jack shot at him “point-blank” and missed. bwahahahaha! Tell me another one. Although it IS a funny picture–this pansy crapping his pants.

After only two months in Afghanistan, Idema claimed to have found what would become the lynchpin of his widening media offensive: seven hours of footage that purportedly shows Al Qaeda training camps in action. Before long, Idema had sold video stills to several publications and enlisted the William Morris Agency to auction off the first-time U.S. broadcast rights. “The intent is to sell the tapes to the highest bidder at terms that are ultimately satisfactory to Mr. Idema,” explained a letter signed by Wayne S. Kabak, chief operating officer of William Morris, and hand-delivered to Fox News’s New York offices on January 9 — one day before the auction was slated to take place. The terms included giving Idema “on-air credit as the person who procured these tapes” and the right to refuse any bid under $150,000.

You know, this makes me ill. First, even though it’s apparent that there are more contractors in Iraq than there are active military over there, yet on the basis of his not being “active military”, you paint him with this fraudster brush. Would you paint an employee of Blackwater with a fraudster brush? Why is it that in order to gain some sort of legitimacy with people, you have to either be a government employee or a contractor?

“My President told our nation he was going to unleash hell on the terrorists, and that is exactly what I did… so what’s the problem?” Jack Idema, in an interview.

These conditions, along with Idema’s dark past, gave some networks pause. NBC Nightly News was put off by the hefty price tag and the lack of signs of authenticity, such as a logo from As-Sahab, Al Qaeda’s video production house, which appears on the tapes Al Qaeda releases to the public. “There was no way to verify them,” says Robert Windrem, investigative producer for NBC Nightly News. “It was either you trust Keith Idema or you don’t.”

“No way to verify them”? Give me a break. Eric Campbell of ABC News said this:

One of my colleagues was Elizabeth Neuffer, an experienced and highly regarded correspondent with the Boston Globe. She had impeccable contacts in the US military, and volunteered to check out his credentials to comment on the tapes. Her conclusion was that he was a highly unsavoury character but was “one of the best people in the world to be talking about this.” Elizabeth was later killed in Iraq, but the articles she wrote about the tapes and about Jack attest to her conclusions about him.

And this:

I chose to include Jack in the stories as he had been central to obtaining the tapes, he had viewed them in their entirety, he had the expertise to comment on them and his dealings with the Northern Alliance gave him a good sense of the military situation in Afghanistan and the activities of foreign militants.

To state the obvious, the conclusions Jack drew from the tapes…that al Qaeda was training militants for kidnapping foreigners and conducting urban warfare…has turned out to be perfectly correct in Iraq, something the “expert” quoted in the Columbia Journalism Review chooses to ignore.

And this:

Mir Bacheh Kowt was a 40-minute drive north of Kabul along a half-destroyed road, the same road on which Tim and I had been stoned by the Taliban’s Vice and Virtue Police four years earlier. The Taliban had poisoned the wells and the villages had been destroyed as the frontline shifted back and forth between Kabul and the Panjshir Valley. We drove through now deserted remnants of mud villages that had been caught in the crossfire. Then we saw the mountains behind the village. Sure enough, they were almost bare of snow, meaning that the footage could not have been shot in the warmer weeks since the Taliban had fled.

The villagers in Mir Bacheh Kowt waved al-Qaeda detritus at us, hoping to sell it as souvenirs. A charred copy of the Koran, ammunition casings and even man-shaped shooting targets were among the offerings. They told us that the Taliban had ordered them to leave three years earlier to make way for the foreign fighters. They had just returned to the delapidated remains of their homes to find they had been used for target and bombing practice.

The village school was in a two storey-building I recognised from the tapes. It had been the main training centre. It was eerie to walk through the rooms where Arab and Pakistani militants had been learning to kill and maim. The walls were pockmarked with bullet and mortar holes from live-fire exercises. A blackboard still had a chalk diagram showing the correct shooting stance for close-quarter assassination.

The militants had used the entire village as a training range, blasting each building with machine-gun fire and rocket-propelled grenades. Some buildings were still filled with live shells. Ragged children followed us around the village and toyed with the al-Qaeda debris, playing happily with Zeppelin-shaped grenades. A man with one leg pointed to a row of buildings and told us not to go near them. “Mines”, he said, gesturing at his stump.

If the US military knew of this base, it had certainly not investigated it. Wandering around, we found an extraordinary range of terrorist debris, including instruction manuals, notebooks filled with what looked like chemistry lessons and an Arabic translation of a US taskforce paper on counter-terrorism.

So we’re supposed to believe that this slick New York dude with the sunglasses somehow waved a magic wand, made the snow on the mountains match, brought Arabs into the area and made these tapes up himself, and was brilliant enough to get the villagers to corroborate what was on the tapes and gave them the paraphernalia to sell from the tapes, although they’ve never even seen them. GIVE ME A BREAK. And then he says:

the intriguing thing about Jack was how much of what he said checked out. He definitely HAD wrangled himself a position as military adviser to the Afghans. We had seen enough of his dealings with Hazrat Ali and other Northern Alliance officials to be sure of that. He had extraordinary good contacts in the new government and was able to get us any interview or access to any location we wanted. US journalists bidding for the footage were able to confirm that he had served in Special Forces. Above all, the tapes of the al-Qaeda training camp were genuine. We had confirmed that from the detritus left at Mir Bacheh Kowt and the accounts of the villagers.

If Neuffer and Campbell isn’t enough, there’s Peter Bergen:

Last October, New York magazine raised the possibility that the Al Qaeda videotapes Idema supplied to 60 Minutes II were faked, a seemingly plausible scenario given Idema’s previous fraud conviction. But when I visited the town of Mir Bacha Kot, about a half-hour north of Kabul, Deputy Police Chief Mohammed Araf told me that Arabs had indeed used the town as a military base under the Taliban, and the buildings in Mir Bacha Kot match those on the Idema-supplied tapes. A journalist from a leading U.S. media organization who evaluated the tapes told me he had no doubt they were authentic…

I see plenty of people -journalists–who WERE THERE and claimed they were authentic because they helped vet them. And that doesn’t even include the General at Bagram AFB in Kabul who also attests to their authenticity.

CNN backed off precisely because it decided Idema could not be trusted. This was after the network’s national security analyst, Ken Robinson, searched Google and LexisNexis and discovered that Idema not only had a criminal record, but also liked to batter his rivals with lawsuits. In addition to turning down the tapes, the network decided to shun Idema as a source. It was the only network to do so.

CNN wasn’t even involved. And if it was, I’d like to see the documentation and hear the names of the people providing it.

On January 17, CBS’s 60 Minutes II ran a story about the tapes. Dan Rather traveled to Afghanistan to interview Idema and visit the dusty, bullet-scarred compound called Mir Bacha Kot, where the filming had been done. At a time when workers were still sifting through the gnarled wreckage of the World Trade Center, the story reinforced the prevailing sense of panic. Men in camouflaged tunics and ski masks were shown storming buildings, staging drive-by shootings, and laying siege to golf courses. Sometimes the men laughed as they rehearsed maneuvers, which Rather interpreted as evidence that they approached their grim mission with “glee.” The footage also contained numerous exchanges in English, “a sign,” Rather told viewers, “that they want to take scenes like this to the West.”

This was also verified by other REAL journalists, lol…who weren’t being fed lies and documents by the Smear Jack Cabal.

ABC, MSNBC, NBC, and the BBC subsequently paid thousands of dollars to air the training-camp footage, according to Idema’s bank records. These records, interviews with Idema’s associates and Idema’s own e-mails, suggest that money from media activities, including the tapes, helped fund his 2004 operations in Afghanistan.

More creative storytelling, no doubt. If he found a way to fund his operation, I don’t see what the big deal is. He hasn’t signed allegiance to a foreign country, he hasn’t given up his US citizenship, which is certainly something many of the Afghan officials should do but haven’t. AND, he’s not rolling in money, driving a Rolls Royce with an expensive exotic bird collection, but is giving the money he gets back to the Afghans he works with in terms of food and medical supplies, among many other things.

Does this paragraph ring any alarm bells for anyone besides li’l ole me? Where did you get these “e-mails” and “bank records”, Mariah? And who exactly would these “associates” be?

Could it possibly be a certain blogger in Romania who published certain attorney-client privileged information and emails (which in itself is frightening because it outlined the legal strategy for the trial in Afghanistan.)? Or could it be connected with your relationship with Hagler, who was surprisingly present when you met with MSgt Bumback? Or perhaps Tod Robberson, who broke into their Afghan cell and stole personal effects and documents while they were in an Afghan court and left a note that he’d been there? Or could you be referring to private correspondence and records that you yourself stole from Jack’s office when you were given a tour and an interview by one of his associates? Actually, I don’t recall the chronology of all these events, but there is enough here that stinks to indicate there is some serious “spinning” of the facts in this story in this piece.

Along the way, Idema gave varying accounts of how he got the tapes. He told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s Eric Campbell that he bought them from one of his intelligence assets after a series of “back-alley meetings at midnight.” In contrast, he told NBC’s Today show that he and a group of Northern Alliance fighters “took over” Mir Bacha Kot, then went to the house of the camp’s commander, where they found some of the tapes. They then hunted down “soldiers” (presumably Al Qaeda recruits) to get the others.

WOW that one is really incredible. A clear example of more obfuscation of the truth with no facts to back it up. Hmmm. In all that I’ve read of Campbell’s accounts, including the several chapters in his book Absurdistan, I haven’t seen anything he’s written that alludes to “back-alley meetings at midnight”. Obviously I’ve missed something, lol…tell me another one!

Tracy-Paul Warrington, former deputy commander of a Special Forces counterterrorism team and a civilian intelligence analyst for the Defense Department, believes there’s a good reason Idema’s story changed. “In a nutshell, the videotapes are forgeries,” he says. He explains that the tactics shown in the tapes (such as the way the trainees handle their weapons) were developed in the 1970s but abandoned shortly thereafter, and are not used by modern-day Al Qaeda troops. Also, Warrington points out that the tapes depict mostly raids, whereas “Al Qaeda almost exclusively uses bombs.” Finally, Idema claimed in most accounts to have found the tapes around Mir Bacha Kot, an area that Warrington contends was already under coalition control and had been thoroughly searched by coalition forces. “This man who was convicted of fraud says he finds these tapes where nobody else found them,” says Warrington. “That should have set some alarm bells off.”

What should be setting alarm bells off is Tracy Warrington being quoted as a terrorism “expert”, lol.

There are conflicting reports about the CIA’s stance on the tapes. A retired senior special operations officer with nearly two decades of counterterrorism experience says that while he was on active duty he learned from a CIA contact that the agency had evaluated the tapes. “They did a voice analysis and a technical analysis,” reports the man, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Not only were they staged, but you could single Idema’s voice out directly.” On the other hand, the CIA public affairs office says the agency “did not conduct voice analysis of the tape or draw any conclusion regarding its authenticity.”

Now who would that supposed source be? uh…doh! Joe Cafasso (the Colonel that wasn’t)! Gee Mariah, you’re brilliant *snort*…I wouldn’t have printed his name, either.

CBS employees received the tapes from Idema directly, and vetted them on the ground in Afghanistan at a time when the country was still in shambles and the network’s Kabul bureau was operating out of a house with spotty phone service. The network’s spokesperson, Kelli Edwards, says CBS nevertheless went to great lengths to ensure the tapes were authentic before airing them. This included “confirming with U.S. military officials that the camp in the video was, in fact, an Al Qaeda training camp . . . showing the tapes to three former British Special Forces officers, who verified the tactics being practiced in the video were consistent with those of Al Qaeda, and to a top U.S. military official in Afghanistan who told us that, in his opinion, the video was authentic.” The network says it can’t reveal those officials’ names because they offered their opinions on condition of anonymity.

hehehe “can’t reveal those officials’ names”. I already talked about CBS’ involvement in this–and their denial of the facts, of their being present, are getting them sued, but the fact remains; they were printing the same line the other media printed because otherwise they would have been implicated in another “scandal”, which they didn’t think they could afford after Rathergate and the fiasco with the Bush memos (among other things).

Of all the networks, CBS had the longest-standing relationship with Idema. It had used him as a source or consultant on two projects before his arrival in Afghanistan. The first was the 1995 nuclear-smuggling story, called “The Worst Nightmare,” which was produced by Scurka and aired on 60 Minutes.

Yes, I suppose there HAS to be SOME truth in this entire rag piece…otherwise it would be more glaring propaganda than it already is!

Scurka had initially heard that Idema, who was then awaiting sentencing on fraud charges, had a lead on a hot story about the smuggling that he had picked up while operating his traveling exposition. Idema agreed to share information with Scurka. Scurka, meanwhile, lent a sympathetic ear to Idema’s story about an injustice he felt he had suffered. Idema claimed the FBI had framed him on the fraud charges because he had refused to tell the agency where he learned about the nuclear smuggling, fearing leaks could hurt his sources.

This is also misleading, but what do you expect?

The 60 Minutes piece, and a companion story in U.S. News & World Report, won that year’s Renner Award from Investigative Reporters and Editors, Inc. Idema never got any credit, though. This came as a blow to Scurka, who has maintained Idema was a key source and that CBS decided to cut any reference to him largely because he was imprisoned for fraud by the time the story aired. Edwards, the CBS spokesperson, suggests Idema’s contributions didn’t necessarily merit credit, since the final story, which took six months to investigate, was “much different than the story we initially began pursuing.”

After “The Worst Nightmare” aired, Scurka and Caraballo started work on a film about Idema, called Any Lesser Man, “the Real story of one lone Green Beret’s private war against KGB Nuclear Smuggling, Soviet spies, Arab terrorists, and the FBI,” according to promotional materials. Despite years of effort, they were never able to scrape together enough money to complete it.

In 2000, Idema hooked up with CBS again. This time he and Scurka served as consultants to 48 Hours, then anchored by Dan Rather. They worked on an investigative story about Colonel George Marecek, a highly decorated Special Forces officer accused of murdering his wife, Viparet. But the two were eventually fired from the project. “48 Hours determined they had taken on an advocacy role for the defense,” explains Edwards of CBS. Indeed, Idema and Scurka had opened a “Free Marecek” office in Wilmington, North Carolina, where the trial was taking place, and one witness alleged that Idema and another man came to his house to harass him the night before he was slated to testify. Idema also told several associates he was detained for impersonating a police officer in an effort to get into a Detroit prison and convince a convicted serial killer to confess to Viparet’s murder. Despite concerns about Idema and Scurka’s objectivity, in December 2000, 48 Hours ran a story on Marecek, with much of the exculpatory evidence drawn from their research.

After being sacked by 48 Hours, Idema and Scurka launched a Web site called Point Blank Network News, or PBN, where they ran their own version of the Marecek story. The piece won a 2001 National Press Club award for online journalism. Despite the media attention, Marecek was convicted.

And what’s that supposed to prove? That the story was a lie?

If the coverage of the Al Qaeda training camp tapes lent Idema credibility and renown, his old friend Robin Moore further lionized him by making him one of the lead characters of his blockbuster book, The Hunt for Bin Laden, published by Random House.

Moore, a seventy-nine-year-old with clear blue eyes and bushy eyebrows, wears houndstooth blazers and leans on an ivory-handled cane. Like Idema, he has long straddled the divide between the media and military camps. To get access for his first best-seller, The Green Berets, he went through the grueling Special Forces qualification course, something no other civilian has ever done. He later covered the Vietnam War for Hearst Newspapers, and, because of his combat skills, was allowed to travel with operational detachments that were closed to other reporters. This meant he was sometimes forced to fight. On his living room wall Moore has hung a black-and-white photo of himself gripping the sagging body of a Vietnamese boy he had killed.

From what I’ve heard about people who have visited Moore’s house on numerous occasions–there is no such photo.

It was after seeing The Green Berets, a 1968 film based on Moore’s book, that twelve-year-old Keith Idema decided he would join the Special Forces. But it wasn’t until years later, when he was peddling special operations equipment, that he actually met Moore. Over time, a deep bond developed between the two men. “Robin is . . . not only my friend,” Idema wrote Scurka while he was imprisoned on fraud charges. “He is my idol, almost my creator in a way.”

Idema got involved in The Hunt for Bin Laden book project in July 2002, not long after returning to the United States. Moore said he asked Idema to help with the book because at the time he was one of the few people in the United States with up-to-date knowledge about the situation on the ground in Afghanistan. Idema, he says, was only supposed to help ensure the book’s accuracy. But he soon started adding information.

According to Moore, Idema wrote only select sections of the book. Marianne Strong, the agent who represented Moore on The Hunt for Bin Laden, tells a different story. “Jack wrote the book,” she says. “Robin Moore started the book, but Robin Moore couldn’t write the book, for a number of reasons” — among them a case of Parkinson’s disease so advanced that he has difficulty signing his name. Idema, in fact, gets a credit line on the cover of the British version, and has filed a claim with the Library of Congress for sole copyright on it and on the American version. He also receives a portion of the royalties. A review of a manuscript draft of The Hunt for Bin Laden provided by Moore and dated June 1, 2002, just before Idema returned from his first trip to Afghanistan, suggests that the truth lies somewhere in between Strong’s and Moore’s accounts. Idema doesn’t appear to have written the whole book, but the manuscript did change dramatically after he got involved.

The Hunt for Bin Laden was published on March 3, 2003, and within weeks it was number four on The New York Times bestseller list. To date, it has sold nearly 150,000 copies. The book portrays Idema, by turns, as a superhuman warrior, undercover spy, and rough-and-tumble cultural ambassador. He rescues injured children, removes bullets from “dozens” of Northern Alliance soldiers, and embarks on intelligence-gathering missions that the CIA shuns because they’re too dangerous. Armed with a Russian assault rifle, he holds a band of hostage takers off for hours. He also uncovers a plot to assassinate former President Bill Clinton, nearly nabs Osama bin Laden, and captures a trove of documents detailing the Qaeda leader’s “terrorist plans.”

Your depiction of what he accomplished and his account of the story which is true–negates any truth that might be present in this paragraph.

Some of the heroic scenes don’t match eyewitness accounts. This includes a detailed description of Idema rescuing his longtime friend Gary Scurka, who was hit by shrapnel in a Taliban artillery attack. The book describes Idema taking command of the chaotic situation, fixing the sloppy bandage applied by journalists Tim Friend and Kevin Sites, and whisking Scurka to safety. Others who were present — including Friend and a former Special Forces soldier, Greg Long — describe a different scene. They say Sites, Friend, and Long applied a proper dressing. Friend, in fact, had worked as a surgical technician for six years. But when Idema arrived he ripped off the bandages and put on new ones, as the National Geographic cameraman recorded his every move. “It was only in retrospect that I realized he was acting for the camera,” Friend says.

The only picture there is available of this is–Gary Scurka with 2 tornequets wrapped around Gary’s leg, without Idema in the picture–but Tim Friend, a french journalist (the woman) and Gary. If anyone knows anything about combat medicine, you would know that applying a tourneqet is an absolute last resort, and this picture is certainly not an example of someone who is suitable for transport to an aid station.

When Gary Scurka was wounded in November 2001, Tim Friend (Sullivan’s “source”) had helped put his Afghan scarf around one of Scurka’s legs. Medical care was hours away, and Scurka was losing massive amounts of blood. Jack and Greg Long took Scurka across the river, where JACK put Scurka in a Land Cruiser and did ALL of his medical work out of camera view. Jack took off the scarves, found three more unseen severe wounds, and administered antibiotic and Demerol injections, then jack stopped the bleeding with hemostats and Combat Trauma Dressings. But NOT BEFORE Jack told Scurka’s cameraman to “put the fucking camera down and hand me scissors and hemostats out of that bag [pointing to his medic bag].” THAT is one reason why you have not seen Jack’s efforts “on film,” although there is film of Jack there and evacuating Scurka, and Jack later asked Scurka NOT to air his face. Scurka confirmed all of this in a sworn statement under oath. Scurka also confirmed that Jack saved his life that day, NOT “Sir” Edward Artis, who was more than a hundred miles away when it happened, although, as Jack points out in THE HUNT FOR BIN LADEN, it was Kevin Sites who pulled Scurka off the hill and was the hero that day. Read what Scurka said in the Fayetteville Observer when he returned home.

NBC and National Geographic were filming, but Idema was cut out of the tape. If he was a money-grubbing Walter Mitty fake guy, then why would he insist that he be cut out of the tape? If he wants to be depicted as a “hero”? No, that’s the exact profile of Ed Artis.

Ed Artis of Knightsbridge International, the guy they keep quoting in these hit pieces, had been careful not to sign a release while they were in Afghanistan. When he got home, his lawyer sent National Geographic’s David Royal a 7-page letter, telling National Geographic what the terms of releasing any footage would be. Part of the terms of that agreement was that Artis and Knightsbridge’s involvement would be on prominent display throughout their coverage.

Idema, on the other hand, sent them a 1-page letter, saying he didn’t want his identity revealed and if they were to show footage of him, that his face should be blurred. That doesn’t fit the picture you’re trying to paint, here, but none of the facts do. Astonishing! NOT.

Moore had collaborated with Idema on several projects before The Hunt for Bin Laden, and even secured an agent for a book, Any Lesser Man, about Idema’s life. He also contributed $2,500 to the film project of the same name. During that period, Moore, highly respected by Green Berets, started getting warning e-mails from members of the Special Forces community. “Mr. Idema is not near the man/hero that he is being made out to be,” wrote retired Captain William J. Adams in August 1999. “Lots of information provided by him doesn’t wash according to eyewitness accounts and his demonstrated performance on active duty.”

In the media push that followed the release of The Hunt for Bin Laden, Idema became its spokesman. This period, which marked the crescendo of his career as a media personality, came during the run-up to the Iraq war, and in the dozens of interviews Idema fielded, he often doubled as an expert on the looming conflict.

Many of Idema’s claims, such as the Iraq-Al Qaeda connection, have since been discredited by the 9-11 Commission and UN weapons inspectors, but by billing him as a government official, the media lent them credence. NPR called him a “U.S. intelligence operative,” while Northeast Public Radio dubbed him “the longest-serving Green Beret in the Afghanistan war.” Others implied that Idema was working in an official capacity by saying he played an “integral” role in the hunt for Osama bin Laden and that he fought “alongside” U.S. Special Forces, or by calling him as a “former Green Beret who served in Afghanistan.”

hehehe and who would be “warning” people. Tracy-Paul Warrington? Or would that be Billy Waugh? In the case of Billy, you completely ignored the content of his 2nd email, where he clarified who “ADAMA” really was.

As Idema was blazing a trail through the talk show circuit, Ed Artis, who felt that Idema’s actions in Afghanistan had put his employees in danger, went on a fax and e-mail blitz to alert the media that there were questions about Idema’s credibility. (Idema has since filed suit against Artis.) Several shows canceled interviews after receiving the warning, something Strong, the book’s agent, resents. “The Hunt would have made it to number one if it weren’t for that,” she says.

Bwahahahah! Ed Artis is talking about SOMEBODY ELSE endangering people? He should look in the mirror. Tell me another one!

Around the same time, Wayne Lawley, then the president of the Special Forces Association, a fraternal organization for past and present Green Berets, sent an e-mail to association members about the book saying: “The knowledgeable reader may be irritated by fiction used to fill in research and outrageous claims by Keith Adema [sic], one of the book’s advisors.” The message was far more measured than some of the replies it prompted. Idema “is doing all he can to besmirch the name of Special Forces, and all we stand for,” wrote Billy Waugh, a former Green Beret and CIA operative, who has detailed his own experience in a 2004 book called Hunting the Jackal. “This man has lied to the nth degree, and all for self-aggrandizement.” Gradually, Moore came to see Idema in a similar light. “He wants to be the hero of every story,” Moore says. “He tries to portray himself as a hero, even if he has to lie.”

Interesting how Wayne Lawley would say something like that when he’s never even met Jack Idema. Billy Waugh sent an original email talking about a guy named ADAMA, saying he’d never been in special forces, which Mariah latched onto with a vengeance in this piece, apparently. She doesn’t mention it was a case of mistaken identity–or bother to say anything about the content of the second email he sent which vouched for Jack IDEMA.

A series of events caused the shift in Moore’s opinion. A “Hunt for Bin Laden” Web site registered to Idema began advertising an upcoming Robin Moore book about Idema entitled An Army of One. Moore said the site was unauthorized and that he never planned to write such a book. Idema also charged about $10,000 worth of books to Moore’s account at Random House. Moore says Idema did this without his permission and that Idema also slipped the names and post office boxes of two groups into a list of charities that appear in the back of the British version of the book (because a percentage of the royalties were to be directed to these groups). One of the addresses was for U.S. Counter-Terrorist Group (Counterr), the umbrella organization for Idema’s own Afghanistan operations. (At least one reader sent a donation to Counterr, according to Idema’s bank records.) The other address was supposed to be for a charity that helped the families of killed or wounded Green Berets, but North Carolina’s postal inspector determined that the post office box was actually controlled by Idema, and was investigating him for mail fraud before his Afghan arrest.

Total lies. First, the whole charity business is the reason that Robin Moore and Chris Thompson want to keep Jack in prison. They stand to gain hundreds of thousands of dollars from money that Jack has fought to go to the orphans and widows of Special Forces soldiers. They even went so far as to divert that money to some fraudulent “foundation” in Florida. Jack wants the money to get to where it’s intended…and the truth of the matter doesn’t depict a very favorable picture of your “sources”, here, Ms. Blake.

These so-called “bank records” DO NOT exist. It is a complete fabrication and myth. Totally made up, never happened. If it did, Mariah Blake and Stacy Sullivan sure as hell would have printed the bank records, but they didn’t. Jack never took a dime from anyone in donations, and every dime he spent in the War On Terror and for humanitarian aid efforts and medical supplies for the Afghans was his OWN money. We bet this one is getting them sued post haste. The source for this, Chris Thompson, was already being sued by Jack because it was Thompson that was stealing money, and Thompson got caught doing it.

Good for him, I hope Ross Perot bankrolls it, and I hope very soon Jack is released and completely freed up to hunt Bin Laden (Qanuni just announced that they’re going to continue fighting the Taliban and Al Q) and actually CAPTURES and/or KILLS him. Now that would certainly set you and the cabal on your asses, wouldn’t it? And it would make total fools out of all the people who have printed this malicious garbage to date.

Moore eventually submitted a host of corrections that he wanted made to The Hunt for Bin Laden, based largely on input from Special Forces contacts, but many were never incorporated. Carol Schneider, Random House’s spokesperson, said the publisher made all changes that it received in time, but a number of them came after the deadline had passed. Then, in late October, Robin Moore gave Random House a proposal for a scathing second book on Idema, Smoke and Mirrors: Jonathan Keith Idema and his Great Media Swindle, but Random House turned it down. “I’m not going to do this,” Bob Loomis, vice president and executive editor for the publisher, said to Moore, as cjr’s reporter sat listening over a speakerphone in Moore’s living room. “It’s too negative on Jack. It reflects badly on The Hunt because of his role in it.”

And you forgot to mention who else was behind that proposal, Mariah.

Idema headed back to Afghanistan in mid-April 2004, accompanied by Caraballo, who would claim after their arrest that he was a journalist working on an independent documentary. But according to bank records, Idema was paying him.

Here we go again with that bank records thing. If there actually were any that prove that, I’m sure they would have appeared at Flogging the Simian. They didn’t show up anywhere, so the interesting question is–what bank records?

Idema’s lawyer, John Edwards Tiffany, says that by the end of April Idema had arrested his first prisoner, whom he turned over to U.S. officials on May 3. But two months later the man was released after the United States Central Command determined that he was not the high-ranking Taliban official Idema had claimed he was. The command began to investigate Idema, and shortly thereafter Wanted posters for Idema went up in Kabul. He and his cohorts nevertheless made a series of arrests in June, according to Tiffany. It wasn’t until July 5 that Afghan police finally nabbed him, along with Caraballo, the former U.S. soldier Brent Bennett, and four Afghans who were working with them. At the time, the Abu Ghraib scandal was raging. Idema claimed he was working with the knowledge and approval of the U.S. government (something the Central Command and the State Department adamantly deny) and presented some evidence to support this claim during his trial. But none of it seems to point to definitive links to the Afghan or U.S. governments. Among the material is a video of meetings between Idema and two Afghan ministers. But both reportedly said they met with Idema to discuss his claims about the taxi-bomb plot only because they believed he was a member of the U.S. military. Tiffany also played tape-recorded conversations of Idema purportedly talking to officials in Deputy Undersecretary of Defense William G. Boykin’s office. In one of the conversations, recorded after the Wanted posters for him went up, Idema threatens to give some unidentified material to the press. “Someone’s got to do something within twelve hours or I’m going to e-mail this fucking thing to Dan Rather,” he warns. “Do you think I would rot in prison if there’s a problem?”

So you acknowledge there were connections to the US Government, albeit in a back-handed sort of way. By the way, Sherajan was arrested, stitched up, and turned over to Bagram and he’s now at GITMO. So how you could possibly say that he “had no connection to terrorism” is beyond me.

Most of the evidence, though, is one-directional communication, with Idema offering information or asking for assistance. There may be a reason for this: According to Bumback, and Idema’s own e-mails, Idema had been trying desperately to secure a Pentagon contract, but hadn’t been able to do so. Bumback says that’s why Idema largely relied on the media to fund his operations. “Somebody had to replenish the till,” he says. “Uncle Sam wasn’t doing it.”

From what I gathered, he refused to sign a contract because it would have tied him up in bureacratic red tape…much like the SF Operators are feeling now who are in the field, relegated to social working bodyguards for Karzai and others. What’s happened here–is they’ve gone from killing and capturing terrorists, to being horrified by the terrorists’ claims of “torture” out of their Al Qaeda playbook (lying and complaining about the treatment by their captors). Releasing a terrorist like Ghulumsaki because he was supposedly “innocent”, and then lo and behold, there’s a bombing at Bagram immediately following, where he was involved. WHEW, it doesn’t take two brain cells to put together what happened there. All of Jack’s work and all of the events that led up to July 6 were necessary. Jack captured with all that evidence–the bomb components, the plans to blow up Bagram, the PA system already rigged with explosives to kill Qanooni, the night letter from Mullah Omar, the letter from Gitmo, and on and on–but he’s the guy who gets starved and tortured, and the terrorists are let go.

Some kind of world we live in, heh?

Despite his problems, including a December shootout in his cell block, Idema continues to hatch ever-more creative schemes to ensure that history portrays him as a swashbuckling hero. From his jail cell he is telling associates that he plans lawsuits against Tod Robberson of The Dallas Morning News and the freelance journalist Stacy Sullivan, two reporters who have written investigative pieces about him since his arrest in Afghanistan.

“Investigative pieces”? Is THAT what you call this garbage? bwahahahaha! Don’t make me laugh.

Let’s see. How in the world would Tod Robberson know this? Because he broke into their cell while they were in an Afghan court and stole personal effects and documents. It appears that theft is one of the criteria for “investigative journalists” these days, and spinning what they find to someone’s detriment is another.

Robberson lied to Afghan officials at Pulacharke that he was acting on behalf o the US government and the US Department of Defense and was there to “inspect” their living conditions. Afghan officials (understandably) concluded he was an employee of the US government. Robberson conviently left out the fact that he’s a privately employed journalist. It’s also rumored that Robberson showed a DOD press ID card to confuse and defraud officials. Robberson removed documents, photographs and files, including letters between Jack, Brent and Ed, family correspondence, audiotapes, evidence that was crucial for their defense, including government documents that were supposed to be used in the upcoming trial to the Appellate Court. These documents were crucial for their defense, because they showed not only that they were innocent, but that they were working for their governments.

The finishing touch was the note he left “Hi, Jack! I came to see you but you were out.” written on a copy of Stacy Sullivan’s New York Metro Magazine article “Operation Desert Fraud”. Is Robberson that dumb that he would blatantly link himself to another supposed journalist who ran a hit piece on Idema with that note? Apparently so! Mariah’s connection with Stacy Sullivan is all over her piece, too, so it appears as though the three of them (and possibly more) are all comparing notes and sharing their lying sources!

But that’s the whole idea behind the CABAL’s lies and reporting with this incredible “bias” against someone who’s honorably fighting the war on terror and has the training, skill, ability and courage to hunt Bin Laden. Depicting him as a money-hungry publicity hungry “mercenary” or “bounty hunter” detracts from the whole reason he’s there, and what he’s trying to accomplish.

The fact that the State department has turned their backs on him, the media has crucified him, friends have betrayed him for money, and the FBI tortured him through Afghan proxies makes this story even stranger than fiction. How far the players have gone to destroy the man, and how far the media has gone to distort the facts and make up lies is justification to examine closely every single story that’s put out by the MSM. Already over 90% of the American public distrust what the media reports, is it any wonder why?

Idema made it clear in a recent letter to one of his attorneys (who was instructed in the letter to distribute it to other members of Idema’s inner circle) that his goal was to influence future coverage. “Whatever we sue them for doesn’t matter,” he wrote. “It puts all the others on notice that 1) we will and can sue; 2) I still have fangs, and lawyers, even from an Afghan prison cell; 3) other people better check their stories . . . .” Idema is also apparently trying to sway coverage by making reporters sign detailed contracts in order to get an interview with him. Tiffany, Idema’s attorney, says at least one journalist has already done so. Idema wouldn’t speak with cjr because the magazine refused to sign such an agreement.

Trying to “sway” coverage. Yeah, you might see it that way, considering all the stuff you made up here, Mariah, what he’s really after is reporting what happened…because HE WAS THERE. YOU WEREN’T.

Idema is a brilliant lawyer (and his friends aren’t too shabby, either), and I’m afraid most of the people involved in smearing him have completely underestimated him. With this in mind, Jack, his wife, and his family have suffered terribly as a result of the slanderous coverage of his story from the media and the Smear Jack Cabal, so it is no wonder that he’s fighting back. He’s not trying to “sway coverage”, he’s trying to set the record straight and stop people from lying and spreading falsifications like the breathtaking attempt at discrediting the validity of the Al Qaeda tapes.

Meanwhile, Idema is negotiating with an agent regarding a film about his exploits. And Strong, Moore’s former agent, recently received a 12,000-word installment of Idema’s book, which she said she has already discussed with dozens of publishers. Its working title: Army of One.

I hope to hell that it comes out, because it will tell a lot more of the story than the media has been interesting in doing.

Perhaps these developments explain the optimism pouring out of Idema’s Afghan prison cell. “When Caesar crossed into Italy with his legion . . . he said, ‘let the dice fly high,’” he wrote in a recent letter. “Well, we did, and although we are down, I know I will prevail in the end.”

I have no doubt he will, much to the surprise and dismay of the Smear Jack Cabal which you seem to be in collusion with.

Mariah Blake is an assistant editor at CJR. Additional reporting on this story was provided by A. G. Basoli in Afghanistan. CJR gratefully acknowledges support for this article from the Fund for Investigative Journalism.

She’s not very experienced and wet-behind the ears, but it’s appalling to see this slop is what passes for “Investigative Journalism”. BTW, Mariah Blake applied for a grant from the “Fund for Investigative Journalism” under the pretense of reporting this story counter to what the media was saying. She broke the terms of that agreement by printing precisely what Stacy Sullivan at New York Magazine already had, using the same false sources. But what do you expect? Stacy Sullivan and Mariah Blake were room mates at Columbia U! Explains a little about the horribly boring piece done at CJR called “The Education of Stacy Sullivan”, and the fact that Blake continues to rely upon Stacy Sullivan’s Desert Fraud in yet another hit piece with the full intention of doing nothing other than to discredit the man, make fun of the war on terror (another angle on Michael Moore’s “there is no terrorist threat”), quoting the 9/11 Omission report as fact. Ever hear of ABLE DANGER? Get a life, Blake!

All the more reason to keep blogging. Merry Christmas, Columbia U!

Jack Idema

afghanistan

Technorati Search for Jack Idema

The SuperPatriots and Jack images on this site are used by The Wide Awakes with written copyright permission and any use by any third party is subject to legal action by SuperPatriots.US

Said Cao @ 12:20 pm Comments (0) | Permalink   

I have read this over numerous times and I just have to laugh at what passes for “journalism” these days. I thought I’d start picking apart the inflammatory lies of “Tin Soldier” by Mariah Blake from Columbia Journalism Review–you know, just for kicks. Again, her piece is going to be in bold type because I’ll be quoting from other articles and sources to punctuate certain points.

It’s odd, isn’t it, how simply easy (and fun) it is to pick apart the flagrant misinformation that’s spread by the media on just about any issue. They are becoming completely irrelevant. What’s more is–they seem to be living in an Alice and Wonderland kind of dreamworld because they justify what they do to the ‘nth’ degree, when they have no facts to back them up. It’s quite entertaining what’s being taught as far as Journalism Standards and “ethics” in Journalism school. So the next time you read a piece about the high and mighty ethics and standards of one–oh–Columbia Journalism Review–you might try to remember how “reliable” and “factual” the crap really is.

Let’s begin by acknowledging up front that Zalmay Khalilzad an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Columbia University from 1979-1986, which might explain quite a bit about this piece to begin with.

Ok, now for some fun.

In April, 2004, a former US Special Forces Soldier named Jonathan Keith Idema started shopping a sizzling story to the media.

Is that so? So in those few sentences you have set the stage and have pinned him as some sort of of a con man “shopping a sizzling story”…

He claimed terrorists in Afghanistan planned to use bomb-laden taxicabs to kill key US and Afghan officials, and that he himself intended to thwart the attack.

So he if I’m to swallow what you’re saying here, I’m to follow the assumption that Jack had a crystal ball and planned all this out head of time? Where is your proof that he was saying this before the fact or are we to accept what you’re saying merely at face value?

That’s the problem with so much of this, the statements are made but no verfiable facts are offered so we’re just supposed to blindly believe and go along with it.

Shortly thereafter, he’s headed to Afghanistan, where he spent the next two months conducting a series of raids with his team, which he called Task Force Saber 7. By late June, he claimed to have captured the plotters, and started trying to clinch a deal with television networks by offering them “direct access” to one of the terrorists who, he said, had agreed to tell all.

hmmm. My recollection of these early events are that Idema was in Afghanistan in 2001, before these events and it was reported by your buddies in the AP. You know, Nahrin Earthquake (where he was depicted as a hero), Anaconda (where he was depicted as a hero), etc.

But all that aside, here’s the true story in a nutshell: Gulumsaki was nabbed getting off a bus, and was caught red-handed with a letter from his brother at Gitmo in his pocket. The real news is what all of that intelligence led to.

And contrary to news reports and blogging frauds, CBS had a representative present who was recording everything in addition to Caraballo. You see, CBS originally had an interest in this story. They were interested in reporting on how Idema’s methods were different than those demonstrated by the idiots at Abu Grhaib. In essence, their intention was to report that Abu Ghraib was the exception and not the rule.

In exchange for footage and access, Idema wanted a minimum of $250,000 and prominent play. He asked that ABC send Peter Jennings or Cristopher Cuomo to cover the story. Ultimately ABC turned the story down, as did CNN, a CBS spokesperson, Kelli Edwards, says the network “never seriously considered” it, although Idema was regularly e-mailing Dan Rather’s office and in June, the network sent two employees to Idema’s Kabul headquarters to pick up the sample tape.

That’s interesting, because Idema didn’t talk to anyone but CBS about this. It was Caraballo who had a relationship with ABC and nobody talked with CNN. And to be sure, there is so much more to CBS’s involvement in this story!

CBS wanted to confirm reports that Idema and his team had captured the brother-in-law of bin Laden’s chief of security and the terrorists responsible for the murder of Canadian ISAF Corporal Jamie Brendan Murphy. Corporal Murphy had been murdered in a bombing on Darlaman Road in Kabul on January 27, 2004. Once CBS confirmed this, they saw it as an important story against the war on terror.

Idema told CBS that approval for the story would have to be obtained by the Department of Defense before he could discuss his relationship with Bagram or Task Force 180. Idema told CBS that any story should focus on the United Front Military Forces’ continued efforts to combat Al Qaeda and why Massoud’s UFMF needed continued American supported in their counter terrorist operations.

CBS’s bureau chief, with the approval of Andrew Hayward and others, were inside Sabre 7’s compound during the period when several terrorists were in custody an awaiting transfer to Bagram. CBS’s Michael Brandenberg was at the compound on numerous occasions, and even spoke directly with Osama Bin Laden’s chief of security’s brother in law.

CBS said they wanted to show how co-opting a terrorist accomplished more than humiliation by untrained interrogators. Idema allowed CBS to transmit interrogation video back to the US from the CBS Kabul office.

Idema, who was paying an Emmy Award-winning cameraman to document his activities, even distributed a sample tape of himself arresting people and interrogating hooded suspects. In one scene he is shown blocking a road and emptying passing vehicles. “Put your fucking hands up or I’ll blow your fucking brains out,” he screams at a group of men who have shuffled bewilderedly off a bus and are standing with their flimsy tunics whipping in the wind.

Jack did not pay Caraballo to be a cameraman in Afghanistan. My sources tell me that Jack did not even want to bring Caraballo, or any journalist, and the Army asked him to bring three different journalists, all of which Jack turned down.

Wow, Mariah, pretty dramatic screenplay you’re writing there. I wonder why you completely turned around on this. You didn’t mention how impressed you were with Idema and how you were talking about how great Idema was after viewing those tapes.

Jack dictated a legal contract and within a day or so, there was a response from Columbia Journalism review that it didn’t meet with their “objective” hoity-toity “truth telling” standards. HA! And that they would not comply. AND, they contacted Polaris images to get the same photographs licensed for use that Stacy Sullivan had used (if I’m not mistaken) ILLEGALLY in HER hit piece. So someone is trying to cover for Stacy Sullivan’s putting her neck out there on this one.

The clip where their robes were ‘whipping in the wind” (if I’m not mistaken) was the one where Ghulamsaki was caught red-handed with the Red Cross letter from his brother at Gitmo in his pocket as he got off a bus. The only reason that Idema and his men got the guy was because they had excellent intelligence on where he would be and when. Some guys claim they just drive around and see what happens. Idema isn’t one of those.

These captured terrorists were working with and/or for; Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida, Gulbideen Hekmatyar, Hezb-i-Islami, and the Taliban. Specifically, these terrorists had participated in, supported, and/or personally conducted terrorist bomb attacks against foreign and domestic persons in Afghanistan. A prime target of these terrorists was U.S. military forces at Bagram Airbase north of Kabul in Afghanistan. In fact, the American FBI later confirmed Task Force Saber/7’s intelligence reports that several of the terrorists were going to drive fuel trucks into Bagram and explode them into U.S. military barracks in a terrorist bomb attack similar to the bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983 in which 244 U.S. Marines were killed. Using a rare incendiary explosive to detonate fuel tanks on the gas trucks entering Bagram daily, and taxis, the terrorists expected to kill more than 500 American soldiers, two ministers, and two ambassadors in at least five separate coordinated attacks. These same terrorists had already made at least one attempt on the Defence Minister, and two failed attempts on the 3rd Corps commander, General Attiquallah Lodeen, a close friend and trusted ally of the United States and a candidate for Parliament.

Several of the captured terrorists were directly involved in the killing of Canadian Lance Corporal Jamie Murphy on January 27, 2004 in Kabul, the killing and wounding of election and aid workers in Nangahar and other provinces in Afghanistan, the attack of NATO ISAF forces in Kabul, and were currently planning and coordinating the assassinations of several of Karzai’s key political opponents in the Jamiat Party, including his Minister of Defense, Minister of Education, several Corps Commanders (former Northern Alliance Generals), and at least two Afghan Ambassadors (in Delhi and London) who supported the U.S. War on Terror. The Minister of Education, Yunis Qanooni, was the lead opponent to Karzai in Afghanistan’s new election under the Bonn Agreement, and was a prime target of the terrorists, along with Marshall Fahim, the Minister of Defence, and General Rashid Dostum.

All of the terrorists had been arrested by Task Force Saber/7 with either actual explosives, detonators, bomb parts, and/or bomb plans in their possession, as well as documents and correspondence proving their links and association with the Taliban, Hezb-i-Islami, and al-Qaida, including handwritten maps and diagrams of a past bomb attack on General Lodeen, a Shabnama “night letter” calling for a jihad against Americans authored by none other than Mullah Omar himself, and in the case of a terrorist named Ghulamsaki a coded Red Cross letter from his brother (Mohammed Asef), an al-Qaida detainee in Cuba. Additionally, one of the terrorist’s taxis tested positive for explosives by German ISAF bomb teams. The physical evidence against the terrorists was irrefutable, conclusive, and backed-up by incriminating videotaped statements, undercover surveillance, informants, and extraordinary physical evidence.

I’m sure you reported the lies [instead of the real story (which I find more interesting and compelling about Jack’s character than the lies)] -that other journalists and probably your editor had decided upon. But contrary to the picture you’re trying to paint, THAT is what REALLY happened.

It appears that Idema still hadn’t sold the taxicab story by July 5, when his situation took a turn for the worse. The Afghan police raided his headquarters and discovered eight prisoners, some of them tethered to chairs in a back room, which was littered with bloody cloth. The men told reporters that they had been starved, beaten, doused with scalding water, and forced to languish for days in their own feces.

Give me a break. The red cross reports showed absolutely no evidence of torture except for one guy–some abrasions on his ankle because the flexicuffs were on too tight, and he was struggling to get out of them. No pictures emerged of the “bloody cloth”, either. And do you think if there were pictures of actual torture that the media wouldn’t have had a field day broadcasting them?

As far as I recall, the actual complaint was that he wasn’t allowed to take a PISS for 12 hours, and that violated Islamic law. That’s a little bit different than languishing “for days in their own feces”. All of the other things were later done to Jack and his men at Saderat after they were taken into custody on July 6.

Of course, there was one picture that was put up at ABC Australia that showed Jack stitching up the terrorist Sherajan. Someone wrote that what he was doing in that picture was some weird kind of Nazi torture technique of removing brain tissue or some garbage. Actually, people at Bagram said he had fixed up that wound rather well and it was healing nicely. So those reports of Jack “torturing innocent Afghans” is so far off the mark it’s breathtaking. Sharajan was also captured in May, long before the events that led up to their arrest on July 6.

CBS’ Michael Brandenburg was at the compound on numerous occasions, and witnessed the interrogation of Al Qaeda terrorists at the compound. Idema allowed CBS’ representative to watch the interrogation of Corporal Murphy’s killers, and view each of the terrorists in custody. Brandenburg was also allowed to speak directly with the brother-in-law of Bin Laden’s Chief of Security, who was cooperating fully and willingly. CBS employees saw the methods of interrogation, the physical condition of the terrorist, and the conditions of the terrorists’ detention, and knew that no torture was occuring.

They didn’t, of course, admit this after Idema’s arrest because that would have indicated they were present and knew how Idema was conducting the questioning of the terrorists. So instead of telling the truth, they withheld information and proof that these men were innocent of the charges, and instead, put out the same lies the others were reporting.

Afghan authorities determined that none of the detainees had links to terrorism and set them free. Idema, on the other hand, was arrested, along with two other Americans (the cameraman and a former soldier) and four Afghans, and charged with running an unauthorized prison and torturing inmates. After a cursory trial, he was sentence to serve ten years. (This case is on appeal.)

Yes, the taliban kangaroo court allowed the terrorists to go free, and in August, there was a bombing at Bagram. Yeah. No links to terrorism. Ghulumsaki was one of the perpetrators in that bombing.

Immediately after the “guilty” verdict, they filed and appeal and in the second trial they were declared completely innocent.

The taliban judge (in the first trial), the former soviet communist interpreter and all the rest–didn’t follow any of the rules of law…and later, the two main guys who were touting the story of abuse (Jalili and Mashal) resigned their posts (to save face) and ran off because they were exposed as the Taliban. Judge Sidiq was exposed as the taliban, linked to Hekmatyar (a buddy of Bin Laden’s).

There was a vast difference in the terrorist interrogations done by Idema and the experienced intelligence agents working with him as compared to the young interrogators at Abu Ghraib and other locations. CBS’ Bureau Chief said Heyward wanted to compare Idema’s effective interrogation techniques with the poor techniques used at Abu Ghraib. CBS said they wanted to show how co-opting a terrorist accomplished more than humiliation by untrained interrogators. Idema allowed CBS to transmit interrogation video back to the US from the CBS Kabul office.

Just a few hours after Michael Brandenburg left for the last time, Idema was arrested by anti-UFMF forces, at the request of Interior Minister Ahmad Ali Jalali (exposed later as Taliban or officially “former” Taliban) of “running a torture chamber”, “torturing innocent Afghans”, and other illegal conduct. Three other false claims by Jalali were that Idema had “innocent Afghans hung from the ceiling in his basement”, that the terrorists were being “abused, tortured and starved” and that Idema and his men were “rounding up innocent Muslims with long beards” (only 3 of 11 had long beards).

CBS and other news networks piled on and reported Jalali’s false claims and similar false allegations by Jalali’s spokesman Lutfullah Mashal. Ahmad Ali Jalali was a former Voice of America radio news translator in Washington, DC. Jalali, a vehemently anti-UFMF (Northern Alliance) Pashtun from the south, is alleged to have had a prior relationship with CBS News and Fox News. CBS News had also worked with Lutfullah Mashal in the past. Mashal was a former translator for journalists during the 2001/2002 war and had close connections with the Taliban. Idema had warned both CBS and FOX about Mashal’s Taliban connections in 2001 and 2002, yet they still employed Mashal and worked with him during that time.

Interestingly enough, since these events have taken place, Mashal and Jalali “resigned”.

Don’t these so-called journalists realize how transparent their attempts are at this fakery and fraudulent news reporting?

Note how several of these pieces have come out where they use the same terms, and the same so-called “sources” and “experts” who have turned out to be complete lying frauds. It’s like a handful of journalists are using a handful of lying sources, and writing the same lies to cover for each other while destroying the reputation of someone who’s a legend in SF Ops and deserves much better than this. After what he did–I think he deserves at least a medal! And instead, he got imprisonment and torture with FBI agents laughing in the hallway. Something is terribly wrong with this picture.

For all its outlandish twists, the saga of the taxicab plot was not extraordinary for Idema, who over the years had fed the press a variety of sensational material that seemed to shed light on the shadowy world of secret soldiers, spies and assassins. This time the story never ran, but Idema had been a key source for numerous questionable stories that did. A self-proclaimed terror-fighter who has served time for fraud, Idema took a willing media by storm, glorifying his own exploits, padding his bank account, and providing dubious information to the American public.

Oh that one is rich. Painting Idema with the same brush as assassins and spies really indicates to me that you don’t understand the job of a Green Beret, or the work of special forces. Or who we’re fighting, or war in general. It didn’t seem to me that the AP had any problem with his record before this, when he single-handedly rescued 300 women and children after the earthquake in Nahrin. Take a look at the archived articles here. What this seems to boil down to, Ms. Blake, is media whores talk the line that sells papers. Even if it’s a lie.

What happened to journalists doing RESEARCH for a piece –and providing factual information? Idema may have made some money over the years, but he has also spent much of his own money–to the point where he’s virtually homeless–to fight terrorism and help the people in Afghanistan. But of course telling the truth about the man isn’t as juicy as telling lies that portray him as a ‘rogue bounty hunter’. I’m not sure about that, really…I’d rather see the real story told…and unfortunately I’m only seeing it because of my own research. What a sad commentary about the media!

In January 2002, Idema sold CBS sensational footage, which he called the “VideoX” tapes, that purported to show an Al Qaeda training camp in action. The tapes became the centerpiece of the bombshell 60 Minutes II piece, “Heart of Darkness”, reported by Dan Rather and touted as “the most intimate look yet at how the world’s deadliest terrorist organizaton trains its recruits.” Idema also sold video stills to a number of press outlets, including the Boston Globe. MSNBC, ABC, NBC, the BBC, and others later replayed the tapes. Questions are now emerging about their authenticity, some of which were detailed in a piece by Stacy Sullivan in New York magazine in October.

Boy you apologists are really quick to stroke each other off, aren’t you? Gotta love that one. There are no “questions about their authenticity” except those in the media, like you, who are trying to perpetrate this fraud on the public. And it would also seem that Stacy Sullivan, up until this point, was hanging out there all alone with that ridiculous piece “Operation Desert Fraud” –so someone at the Columbia Journalism Review had to come in and “rescue” her by printing the identical false accusations, using the same questionable lying fraudulent sources!

Here’s Peter Bergen’s response to those lies.

Last October, New York magazine raised the possibility that the Al Qaeda videotapes Idema supplied to 60 Minutes II were faked, a seemingly plausible scenario given Idema’s previous fraud conviction. But when I visited the town of Mir Bacha Kot, about a half-hour north of Kabul, Deputy Police Chief Mohammed Araf told me that Arabs had indeed used the town as a military base under the Taliban, and the buildings in Mir Bacha Kot match those on the Idema-supplied tapes. A journalist from a leading U.S. media organization who evaluated the tapes told me he had no doubt they were authentic but passed on them only because Idema was demanding tens of thousands of dollars for them.

Now consider that what Bergen is saying about Idema asking tens of thousands of dollars for those tapes is true (I don’t believe it for a second.). What do you suppose is the dollar value of the lengths to which he had to go to get that footage? Or the personal sacrifice that he and his family have made in order for him to do this difficult work? Is money any compensation? Probably not.

Do you realize that Idema doesn’t have very much at all at present, and do you know the reasons why?

Idema hasn’t asked for a dime from any journalist for those tapes. But even if he had–he’s virtually homeless because he’s been using his own money to fight this war on terror, and to help the Afghan people. To me, the claim that he’s in this for a buck is disingenuous at best. As a matter of fact, it also seems to me as though it’s the people on the other side who are trying to make a buck off him while he’s in prison and can’t defend himself.

Idema also served as an expert military commentator on Fox News and was a lead character in Robin Moore’s best-selling book “The Hunt for Bin Laden”, which was supposed to chronicle the exploits of U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan. And he fielded hundreds of interviews with major newspapers, television networks, and radio stations, which seem to take his swaggering claims–that he was an active-duty Green Beret in Afghanistan, an undercover spy, an explosives expert, and a key player in the hunt for Osama bin Laden–at face value.

He IS all of those things. And for your all of your elitist bluster, you’ve missed one key point about being a Green Beret. Being a Green Beret is something you earn through your training and courses you’ve taken. It’s an honorary award that President Kennedy began to bestow on SF operatives. IT NEVER GOES AWAY.

From Wikipedia:

Their official motto is De opresso liber (”To liberate the oppressed”).

The Green Beret was originally unauthorized for wear by the U.S. Army. It was legitimized by President John F. Kennedy who encouraged the wearing of the beret by the Special Forces. Preparing for an October 12, 1961 visit to the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the President sent word to the center’s commander, Brigadier General William P. Yarborough, for all Special Forces soldiers to wear the beret as part of the event. The President felt that since they had a special mission, Special Forces should have something to set them apart from the rest. In 1962, he called the Green Beret “a symbol of excellence, a badge of courage, a mark of distinction in the fight for freedom.”

The Green Beret is an AWARD. All other headgear and uniforms are issued when you are assigned to a unit. Dr.’s are not called former doctors, Rangers are not called former Rangers, nor are SEALs called former SEALs, because these are awards which have specific requirements, such as graduating specific schools. I’ve never seen any article declaring that Idema is active military–to the contrary; he’s a Green Beret, and a specialist in several areas as was described in this post.

C’mon, Miss Blake, do your homework. Well actually if you’d done your homework, this piece would have turned out very differently, that is obvious.

Idema used the platform the media provided to spread dubious information, much of it with curcial implications for national security and foreign policy. For example, he claimed to have uncovered a plot to assassinate Bill Clinton; that Bin Laden was dead, and that the Taliban was poisoning the food that the United States was air dropping to feed hungry Afghans. (In fact, people were getting sick from eating the dessicant packed with the food.)

Oh that’s interesting, Miss Blake. The Guardian reported on this in 1998 and is it a coincidence that Jack Idema isn’t mentioned in the article??? I don’t ever quote the Guardian because it’s a socialist rag, but listen to this:

Counter-terrorism and intelligence sources say Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York, was due to carry out the killing in Manila.